• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Poll: Ryzen 7950X3D, 7900X3D, 7800X3D

Will you be purchasing the 7800X3D on the 6th?

  • Total voters
    191
  • Poll closed .
Well after getting worried the 7950x3D won’t be as good as the 13900k for gaming I looked at the AMD provided slides again which shows there is a performance increase over the 13900k. Case closed :p
 
I see someone in the members market struggling to sell their 7700X for about 250 quid one month old.
So I'm thinking I will probably get 200 for mine if that. CEX at a push £170. I mean which is fine because I always was going to sell it but still.

I would prefer the 7800 version of this new CPU because I don't think I'll get much benefit from gaming from the other two, but as I have to wait anyway to see the benchmarks I won't be rushing to get one on launch. Unless they are REALLY impressive.
 
Last edited:
Noxia said:
I see someone in the members market struggling to sell their 7700X for about 250 quid one month old.
So I'm thinking I will probably get 200 for mine if that. CEX at a push £170. I mean which is fine because I always was going to sell it but still.

I would prefer the 7800 version of this new CPU because I don't think I'll get much benefit from gaming from the other two, but as I have to wait anyway to see the benchmarks I won't be rushing to get one on launch. Unless they are REALLY impressive.
Click to expand...

Trouble is you can get a 7700 brand new for £340 now... they just don't hold their value if you buy in early.
 
Bencher said:
The last 3 pages? I mean that's what I originally said and you accused me of not providing citations ,so I assumed you disagree that intel is better in st and mixed workloads. If you don't,then it's fine
Click to expand...

Cite it or stop, please :)
 
Bencher said:
But how is that relevant to the st power consumption? It's common knowledge that intel is much better at at or mixed usage tasks both in speed and efficiency.
Click to expand...
humbug said:
Is it?
You never provide any citation to your blanket statements. I can't workout if you believe what you write or if you're just trolling.
Click to expand...
Is that your little brother posting or what?
 
humbug said:
Then how do you know?
Click to expand...
Is this trolling? A moment ago you said you never disagreed, now you we are back to square one again. It's pointless, as ive said from the get go, you won't accept any source showing amd in a bad light, even those you post yourself, lol
 
You've gone from poo pooing it to trying to steel man it, why? It makes no sense...

Bencher said:
Is this trolling? A moment ago you said you never disagreed, now you we are back to square one again. It's pointless, as ive said from the get go, you won't accept any source showing amd in a bad light, even those you post yourself, lol
Click to expand...

I'm not trolling, i'm being serious. Its a simple question.
 
Last edited:
Bencher said:
Where do you get that nonsense from? Trchpoerrup tested single core performance and efficiency,zen 4 is nowhere near close to 13th gen. The 7950x not only pulls more power for single thread tasks, it's also slower,lol.
Click to expand...


Zen 4 is slower than 13th Gen on a clock for clock P core for P core basis. As for power usage, 13th Gen does not use less power though. It uses a little more though 20 to 30% is overstating it. Its probably more like 10% more though it so varies and is subjective depending on workload. Though Intel is much easier to cool relative to its power draw than AMD as the die sense is bigger.
 
Last edited:
Bencher said:
I thought they didnt publish power draw results per test, but just an average across the whole suite. Curlyff posted a link where it shows they actually have individual results.
Click to expand...

You used the Phoronix result i post to steel man your point, after first dismissing it.

What @Curlyriff posted was this.

While the Core i9 13900K was often competing with the Ryzen 9 7950X, where it seriously struggled was in the power consumption and efficiency. Across the entire span of benchmarks carried out, the Core i9 13900K had an average of 158 Watts and a peak recording of 318 Watt power consumption. Meanwhile the Ryzen 9 7950X over the same benchmarks had a 128 Watt average and a peak of 247 Watts.

Those wanting to see all 333 benchmarks in full plus the individual power consumption and performance-per-dollar metrics can find all of my data via this OpenBenchmarking.org result page.
Click to expand...

Read it this time.
 
Last edited:
humbug said:
You used the Phoronix result i post to steel man your point, after first dismissing it.

What @Curlyriff posted was this.



Read it this time.
Click to expand...
I didn't dismiss it, I said they don't provide individual power draw results. Apparently they do , and they prove my ppoint. Curlyriff also said this

Curlyriff said:
I mean that benchmark set from Poronix shows exactly what was being discussed though, things that are single core intensive are better on Intel, multicore rendering AMD, things in between generally Intel and sometimes by a solid margin.
Click to expand...

Read it this time. I've no idea why you keep arguing with facts, lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom