Sounds like you’ll be buying one then?
EPYC or TRPro next. Maybe Sapphire rapids.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Sounds like you’ll be buying one then?
You agree with Dave that it would only take a few months for the difference in wattage usage to pay for the CPU? Really? As that is the only thing I am disagreeing with!I agree with Dave. The advance of this efficiency is stunning. Especially given recent global events. To equate those figures in any other way is ridiculous.
I hope you realiez nvidia cards are more efficient than amd's. .Oh nevermind, you are one of those people that facts are secondary, ignore me
and all huddle together in the backroom gaming den. Nice
I mean the cached chiplet. It’s running at 5.25GHz on the 7950X3D (cached all cores boost). You would need to drop it to 5GHz for it to be the same as a 7800X3D. Assuming of course that the 7800X3D can boost at 5GHz on all cores at once.The speed you see in the specs is the chiplet without cache. If you disable that you drop down to the lower speed chiplet with cache which essentially makes it a 7800X3D.
It's easy to get caught in the hype but at 4k gaming on my 4090 I could upgrade my 7600x for £750 for an average 10 extra fps per game.
I think half the time that's why they do 1080p testing, to make it seem like the difference is massive.
Anyone new to AM5 and just games, get a 7600-7700 and spend the extra 500 on literally anything else.
Why? You just need it to be enabled in Windows AFAIK so it shouldn't interfere in gameplay.Needing to have the Xbox game bar to unlock the full potential is a rough pill to swallow.
Apparently Raptor Lake is also super efficient. Until you switch it on, that is.someone should test all these cpus @ 60fps vsync on gaming, id like to see what the power consumption differences are at those fps.
There's your problem.Why? You just need it to be enabled in Windows AFAIK so it shouldn't interfere in gameplay.
It is in fact efficient in productivity. It sucks in games though, unless you power limit it to 100w and let it do it's thingApparently Raptor Lake is also super efficient. Until you switch it on, that is.
Yeah, it's "fans" like you with these kinds of nonsense that make me hate amd. Keep it upOverclocked 13900 and RTX 3090ti. It’s an equivalent of a 36kw boiler.
Well, understood if you disable it normally for reason x. But it's enabled by default in all Windows installs, so it's a handy way to ensure that games use the optimal CCD for maximum performance without requiring too much hand holding by the user. That's how I see it right now. I'll let you know if my opinion changes once I've used it.There's your problem.
Can't they just make it use the 3d cache CCD at all times in games? I mean I get that some games might run better on the other one, but who cares, the 3d cache is going to be more efficient right? And it's a way simpler solution. Or am I missing something?Well, understood if you disable it normally for reason x. But it's enabled by default in all Windows installs, so it's a handy way to ensure that games use the optimal CCD for maximum performance.
Yeah, it's "fans" like you with these kinds of nonsense that make me hate amd. Keep it up
There's your problem.