Samsung 64GB 2.5" SATA-II MLC Solid State Hard Drive

oggiet

oggiet

oggiet

Associate
Joined
10 Jan 2009
Posts
1,273
VortexA1 said:
well that's good then I'm pleased for you.:D.

Yeah the mobo bios ..I run a dos prompt off a boot cd but I can't type anything lol - just the flashing cursor. Even though I can now use the keyboard more..etc intel matrix raid screen.

I want to upgrade the bios ideally cos I ran raid 0 and it was a nightmare..

The ssd even though the write are probs slow.. I say probs cos I'm not aware of it I love the silence of it and it's very quick loading things up - Windows is so much nippier. A great purchase I'm sure you won't be disappointed m8.

I now hate the sound of the normal hard drive lol!

Let me know how you get on with it. It is in a nice metal case - looks well made and :p lol

(To an earlier poster - yeah I got firefox 3 moved and did it the easier way .Thank you.)
Click to expand...
I have asus mobo and there is section in bios to update from there...its advised to update bios from bios itself then windows. just put it on memory stick and update, very easy indeed :D
yeah just downloading windows 7 and gonna put it on SSD to see how it runs......did you see the price...its up by £15 :p Good i got mine on time
Coolio mate, will let you know how i get on ;)
 
Last edited:

shine

shine

shine

Soldato
Joined
23 Aug 2005
Posts
3,955
Location
Beds
[timko];13677622 said:
Checked it this evening and the price has gone up today. Hopefully some of you guys sneaked in an order for some more before it went up :cool:
Click to expand...

Yeah I bought two more Wed - one for the laptop and one more to put into RAID on the desktop. Glad I saw the price increase warning. :)
 

hernaldo

hernaldo

hernaldo

Associate
Joined
8 Feb 2008
Posts
890
dirtydog said:
RAID 0 with regular HDDs can be little or no quicker at booting Windows or loading applications than a single drive, as these benches show... so I am wondering if SSD is different.

http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=2969&p=8

http://techreport.com/articles.x/9124/6
Click to expand...

Yeah people quote those quite often, but they aren't actually true. RAID0 always feels faster loading stuff. anantech aren't exactly genius type people and prolly didn't set it to a good stripe\cluster size etc.
 

hernaldo

hernaldo

hernaldo

Associate
Joined
8 Feb 2008
Posts
890
90872436.jpg
 

dirtydog

dirtydog

dirtydog

Permabanned
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
47,396
Location
Essex
hernaldo said:
Yeah people quote those quite often, but they aren't actually true. RAID0 always feels faster loading stuff. anantech aren't exactly genius type people and prolly didn't set it to a good stripe\cluster size etc.
Click to expand...

Do you have benchmarks, either your own or someone else's which prove otherwise? :)

Actually by benchmarks, what I mean is, use a stopwatch to determine the loading time of various apps, on a single drive versus two or more in RAID. Rather than synthetic benchmarks like ATTO.
 

FriendlyNameMan

FriendlyNameMan

FriendlyNameMan

Associate
Joined
5 Mar 2009
Posts
8
Benchmarks

Here are my benchmarks for my new SSDs versus my old 74Gb Raptors both in Raid 0. The Samsung speeds dont seem as good as some posted on here so far, I have done all the obvious tweeks etc etc, Any suggestions ? I am running Vista 32bit

Thanks


1z6fprp.png
230g2.png


Edited in so you don't lose it all...
Asus Striker2 Formula E3611, Intel Q9450,2 x EVGA - Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX SLI, 2GB Corsair XMS 6400 DDR2 800MHz Ram, 2 x 74GB Sata WD Raptors Raid 0, 2 x 500GB Sata WD Raid 1, 2 x 500Gb Sata Samsung HD501LJ Raid 1, LG H20L Blue-Ray HL-DT-ST BD-RE GGW-H20L SATA, TSSTcorp CDDVDW SH-S202J ATA, TSSTcorp DVD-ROM,SHD162C, Samsung 2232BW, Windows Vista Ultimate 32bit
 
Last edited:

[timko]

[timko]

[timko]

Soldato
Joined
20 Aug 2004
Posts
3,840
dirtydog said:
I ran the PCMark05 HDD tests on a single drive, it scored 14,874.
Click to expand...

As promised, here's mine...

tko264pcmm.gif


As for the RAID-0 results, I think it's safe to ignore the virus-scanning score.

---------------------| Single drive -----| RAID-0 -----|
General usage -------| 42.157MB/s + 133% = 98.226MB/s
File write ----------| 76.159MB/s + 100% = 152.318MB/s
XP startup ----------| 75.413MB/s + 45% = 109.348MB/s
Application loading -| 67.927MB/s + 38% = 93.739MB/s
-------------------------------------------------------|
(nb. percentage figures are rounded)

So, according to PCMark, general usage and file writes show the most improvement. XP startup and application loading still show an increase but not quite to the same extent.

I suspect you still had your single SSD partitioned in two and reasonably full hence your lower single drive score. Mine are still blank which would be why my single drive results are higher.
 

VortexA1

VortexA1

VortexA1

Soldato
Joined
14 Nov 2006
Posts
2,884
Location
Shoeburyness,England
Originally Posted by LeJimster
Mental B*stard -> Turn write back cache (advanced cache option) on. It's been discussed plenty.

When I had raid 0 enabled it wouldn't all me to edit this - said writing not enabled or something.

With a single ssd it works.

Anyone else find this happening or can you all enable it on raid?
 

LeJimster

LeJimster

LeJimster

Associate
Joined
8 Jan 2003
Posts
421
Location
Sheffield, UK
VortexA1 said:
Originally Posted by LeJimster
Mental B*stard -> Turn write back cache (advanced cache option) on. It's been discussed plenty.

When I had raid 0 enabled it wouldn't all me to edit this - said writing not enabled or something.

With a single ssd it works.

Anyone else find this happening or can you all enable it on raid?
Click to expand...

Can't really help you with that as it works on mine. The only suggestions I can offer is make sure your OS is up-to-date and the intel matrix drivers are the latest if your using an Intel based mobo, otherwise make sure your RAID drivers are up-to-date.
 
Last edited:

dirtydog

dirtydog

dirtydog

Permabanned
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
47,396
Location
Essex
LeJimster said:
Can't really help you with that as it works on mine. The only suggestions I can offer is make sure your OS is up-to-date and the intel matrix drivers are the latest if your using an Intel based mobo, otherwise make sure your RAID drivers are up-to-date.
Click to expand...

Incidentally the Intel Matrix drivers don't work for ICH7 mobos, but maybe my board is ancient technology eh ;)
 

FriendlyNameMan

FriendlyNameMan

FriendlyNameMan

Associate
Joined
5 Mar 2009
Posts
8
LeJimster said:
Are you sure? Because your results look very similar to mine WITHOUT write back cache turned on. --> See my original post
Click to expand...

Yes Mate, see below


eivwjc.png


I have been wondering if the Nvidia storage drivers may be affecting things ?
And also, are there any settings to change in the bios ? I will take a look.

Oh, lol, someone changed my name, haaaahaaaaahaaaaahaaaa
 
Last edited:

VortexA1

VortexA1

VortexA1

Soldato
Joined
14 Nov 2006
Posts
2,884
Location
Shoeburyness,England
dirtydog said:
Incidentally the Intel Matrix drivers don't work for ICH7 mobos, but maybe my board is ancient technology eh ;)
Click to expand...

The matrix drivers installed on mine as per the mobos instructions but 'bah' I didn't install latest. I think mine is ich9 so dirtydog do you have 2 in raid and if you do does write back cache work for you?

When I had raid running there was the error my boot driver not present or something like that. Could only boot when vista disk was in. I even went to the repair console in vista disk and startup repair. Didnt work and other probs too.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom