Hmm, that is a tough one then. You're basically right in between both phones, I suppose many of the big plus points of the Galaxy S II don't really apply to you in many cases.
The only phone I can genuinely say feels very premium is the iPhone 4. The Desire series, Samsung series and Sensation don't seem to emit the same 'expensive' vibe that I find the iPhone 4 does.
The only thing that would worry me (from your perspective) is the battery, I generally find TechRadar to be quite fair and this is what they said about the battery -
There is a slight possibility they had a dodgy unit but it is exactly the same behaviour that the Desire HD had, which is worrying.
I still think the Galaxy S II is probably the better option for you but its hard to say, I'd go and try them both again properly and have a fiddle with TouchWiz on the Galaxy S II. I thought it was a little bit nasty at first but its grown on me and you can remove the majority of it with LauncherPro.
As I said earlier, the new Sense UI isn't getting much praise at all. Its generally good but has a few issues (from the Engadget Sensation review) -
Anyway, to answer your requirements specifically, I'd say this -
I don't know, flip a coin?
The only phone I can genuinely say feels very premium is the iPhone 4. The Desire series, Samsung series and Sensation don't seem to emit the same 'expensive' vibe that I find the iPhone 4 does.
The only thing that would worry me (from your perspective) is the battery, I generally find TechRadar to be quite fair and this is what they said about the battery -
The HTC Desire was fine for us when it came to lasting a day, but others found it would be dead by 7PM. The Desire HD was more universally panned for a poor battery, but still some chastised our verdict of it being unacceptable.
Well, it's going to happen again with the HTC Sensation, as the battery life, to us, seems woeful and not up to scratch. We're talking dead by 8PM with no push email, minimal Wi-Fi and about 30 mins of music and video at the most.
We've cycled it a few times to see if it can be improved, but the same things happens: it holds charge averagely well mostly, but then will get very warm and discharge at a rate of 10% per hour... which is a familiar scenario with the Desire HD.
We constantly kept the applications killed and the notifications to a minimum - but it seems only turning off the background synchronisation altogether helped the issue. And don't even think about hammering the camera in the middle of the day, or you'll be without a phone come the evening for sure.
There is a slight possibility they had a dodgy unit but it is exactly the same behaviour that the Desire HD had, which is worrying.
I still think the Galaxy S II is probably the better option for you but its hard to say, I'd go and try them both again properly and have a fiddle with TouchWiz on the Galaxy S II. I thought it was a little bit nasty at first but its grown on me and you can remove the majority of it with LauncherPro.
As I said earlier, the new Sense UI isn't getting much praise at all. Its generally good but has a few issues (from the Engadget Sensation review) -
Overall, the new Sense UI is designed to make a great first impression, but scratch below the surface and you'll find little substance. We still aren't great fans of the onscreen keyboard, in spite of the extra room on this larger-display handset, and though HTC explicitly promised to improve its input prediction algorithms, we weren't struck by any great improvements there either. Precise text selection and cursor placements are also uniquely challenging on HTC devices, with the execution being arguably worse than on the default Android Gingerbread software. Finally, the move to a more graphically intensive UI does ocassionally take its toll on the phone's otherwise exemplary responsiveness, with detectable traces of lag cropping up here and there.
Anyway, to answer your requirements specifically, I'd say this -
[TW]Fox;19249682 said:Important things:
a) Perceived quality. I am a huge perceived quality nut. I like my products to feel like they are hewn from the finest granite even if they are in reality not. I hate plastic stuff. Also with thise goes pleasing styling.
This could go either way, you probably will prefer the Sensation though.
b) User interface. I love a nice user interface.
Sense is going to edge this, no doubt about it. TouchWiz is worth a proper look though.
c) Functionality as a phone. Thats what it is for me - its a communication device first. Phoney features are important. I want to know at a glance if I have texts etc etc.
The Sensation is probably going to edge this as well due to the LED, but its fairly even.
d) Web browsing - I like to check out the forums when I'm out and about. Though I don't exactly do 1 hour browsing sessions on my phone.
OCUK will display slightly better on the Sensation's screen, but the colours aren't going to be as good and generally the pages will load a bit slower.
The Sensation is also going to be more laggy when scrolling through threads.
Things I use, wouldn't be without, but are not high up the priority list:
a) Camera. I don't want to take pixel perfect shots from 2 miles away. I use the camera for the odd random shot and nothing more. If I want proper photos when I'm somewhere nice, I've got a compact camera that no phone will compare with.
The Galaxy S II makes a great general camera, I use it a lot and I'm happy with the results, even for more serious pictures. The camera interface is great, too.
The Sensation is not as good, but its still a step up from the Desire and Desire HD phones.
b) Media. Obviously the ability to play media is essential but I am not a heavy user. I installed Rockplayer on my Desire and have used it about 8 times in total. I do not listen to music on my phone at all really.
This can only go in favour of the Galaxy S II.
I don't know, flip a coin?