Man of Honour
By wait, I mean hold out for ether a *** or ***WP7.1
I'd star out those swearies mate before a Don sees!
By wait, I mean hold out for ether a *** or ***WP7.1
Vodafone have just informed me, I am now allowed a upgrade
Hmmmmm HTC or Samsung or wait.......
they both suck balls big time as soon as you get any strong light shining on them.
The biggest difference I noted was simply TW vs SENSE, both where slick as you like, even the cameras seemed to give almost identically reasonable performance..
I think you'll agree the Galaxy S II has got your Arc beaten, surely
I'd star out those swearies mate before a Don sees!
Depends on how good the camera, internet use & multimedia use is. I am not fussed about applications as I don't really have many on my phone.
The camera is as good, if not better.
Internet use is the best around, multimedia is the best around out of the box too.
I know Samsung's are well known for using very good DACs. IIRC Wolfson?
What about the HTC?
Not as good, though websites are apparently marginally better to look at when zoomed out on the Sensation due to the qHD res. Camera is apparently worse too.
Sunlit day legibility is poor on the SGSII, proof:
Pretty simple way to look at it:
Samsung produce digital cameras, digital camcorders, monitors, tvs, and music players.
HTC produce phones.
It shouldn't be a surprise that Samsung's hardware components would be better.
It's posts like these that make me think I should stop considering the Sensation.
Using the same theory though you can include Sony in that.
I know Samsung's are well known for using very good DACs. IIRC Wolfson?
What about the HTC?
It's posts like these that make me think I should stop considering the Sensation.
Most Sony stuff is just Samsung components with a Sony badge on
Then again, the same can be said for the iPhone