Scam or world changing technology?

realBabelfish said:
agreed. didnt he invent a perpetual motion machine years ago using magnetic flux? its only now people are looking at them again and realising they work.
Click to expand...

Perpetual motion machines violate several basic laws of physics. Literally the only way something can achieve perpetual motion is to experience zero frictional force. This condition can NEVER be physically met, hence perpetual motion machines are impossible.

Clearly with an external force inputting energy into the system then motion can be maintained in defiance of friction, however eventually at some point in time the external source of energy will no longer be available (it will all have dissipated as heat - due to the friction previously mentioned) and the motion will cease.

The closest thing to perpetual motion you'll get is the constant jiggling around of individual particles, but even this will eventually stop due to heat death (2nd law of thermodynamics) in an infinitely expanding universe.

I find it amusing that 99.9% of all the people who tout the possibility of perpetual motion machines are people who know next to nothing about fundamental physics. It seems odd for people not to do some basic research and look for themselves to understand why it can't happen.

The other 0.1% are knowledgeable people who have made a huge mistake somewhere in their calculations.
 
Last edited:
realBabelfish said:
but doesnt the torus wrapped in coils make the difference? i thought the torus was the crucial difference.
Click to expand...

No, why would it, what does it do. Ahve you seen the YouTube videos. They all require power. There's even one showing his calculations are wrong and how he tells you to wrap it, you don't even end up with the pattern he say you should.
 
And now madaam, all i need from you is your bank account number ..and sort code.. And i will wire you results ..immediatly
 
Glaucus said:
No, why would it, what does it do. Ahve you seen the YouTube videos. They all require power. There's even one showing his calculations are wrong and how he tells you to wrap it, you don't even end up with the pattern he say you should.
Click to expand...

fair play. the one i remember was a basic circuit, where there was a rodin coil attached. when you put a magnet inside the coil, the coil seemed to produce an on/off current that lit a lightbulb. the coil also levitated.

probably ******** but was interesting at the time.
 
Well yes you get a current if you move a magnet through it. It's an electric motor in reverse and used every day in generators. Nothing perpetual or special about it.
 
Glaucus said:
Well yes you get a current if you move a magnet through it. It's an electric motor in reverse and used every day in generators. Nothing perpetual or special about it.
Click to expand...

but it wasnt connected to a battery. so, he is getting energy from flux, and it was moving itself to create this.

so, this is creating energy from a magnet & coil. i guess my physics is pretty **** poor lol. i thought it was interesting anyway.
 
realBabelfish said:
but it wasnt connected to a battery. so, he is getting energy from flux, and it was moving itself to create this.

so, this is creating energy from a magnet & coil. i guess my physics is pretty **** poor lol. i thought it was interesting anyway.
Click to expand...

Yes it is creating energy from a magnet and coil, this is how generators work by moving a conductor through a magnetic field (or moving the magnetic field around the conductor). The key thing here is movement, you can't leave them static and expect energy output, that movement requires energy. Due to inefficiencies in the system the energy obtained from moving the coil (or the field) is always going to be less than the initial energy put into the system. For a perpetual motion device you'd need an efficiency of greater than 100%.
 
realBabelfish said:
but it wasnt connected to a battery. so, he is getting energy from flux, and it was moving itself to create this.

so, this is creating energy from a magnet & coil. i guess my physics is pretty **** poor lol. i thought it was interesting anyway.
Click to expand...

Think for a minute. If this worked wouldn't everyone be using it?
 
We have proved through the systems we have developed that have an internal structure similar to the dual core of the Earth, that mavity is created by the interaction of magnetic fields within the different cores of the planet.
Click to expand...

BAHAHAHAHA!!!

No. mavity is caused by mass, not magnetism. And the Earth has a single core. So... yeah. These guys are crackpots.
 
Blue160 said:
Think for a minute. If this worked wouldn't everyone be using it?
Click to expand...

The aliens (the ones who control the world's governments) are working to keep these old Miyan technologies buried. For good, this time.

They don't want another Galactic Miyan War like the one that happened 3000 years ago. That time, they were only able to be defeated by the combined might of the Asguard and Batman.

That's why no one hears about these mavity defying free-energy technologies these days.
 
Resident said:
Nonsense.

"Tehran to New York in 10 mins maximum"

To do that, assuming you could go from standstill to max speed and back in an instant you'd still need to attain a minimum speed of 36,828mph (Mach 48!) if the craft was flown in the atmosphere which brings issues with G-force & friction amongst others.

Even if this craft went outside the atmosphere, currently in a standard space shuttle it takes around 8 mins to acheive orbit distance with G-forces of upto 3G. Your average joe wouldn't be able to handle that for a start.
Then there's the de-orbit, again in a standard shuttle this from the point of the de-orbit burn to touch down takes around an hour.
Click to expand...

There was some theory/idea in the works of a vacuum travel that would make London to New York ridiculously fast but safe.

Something along the lines of this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vactrain
 
Rossi~ said:
There was some theory/idea in the works of a vacuum travel that would make London to New York ridiculously fast but safe.

Something along the lines of this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vactrain
Click to expand...

London to New York in an hour when traveling through the planet sounds reasonable. High speed travel isn't the problem, for example the Earth travels around the Sun at over 100,000Km/h and rotates at about 1600Km/h. You don't notice it as it's constant, no acceleration or deceleration. The problem comes when you try to attain those high speeds quickly, our bodies just aren't built to sustain the type of g forces which would result from the type of travel outlined in the op.
 
They scoffed when I said I could achieve a low earth orbit with fart power alone, it was not my fault the castors on my chair melted before lift-off :(

I'll show them, then they will have to listen to me! :mad:
 
Antar Bolaeisk said:
London to New York in an hour when traveling through the planet sounds reasonable. High speed travel isn't the problem, for example the Earth travels around the Sun at over 100,000Km/h and rotates at about 1600Km/h. You don't notice it as it's constant, no acceleration or deceleration. The problem comes when you try to attain those high speeds quickly, our bodies just aren't built to sustain the type of g forces which would result from the type of travel outlined in the op.
Click to expand...

Inertia dampers would sort that out.. oh wait thats star trek!
 
realBabelfish said:
but doesnt the torus wrapped in coils make the difference? i thought the torus was the crucial difference.
Click to expand...

Its still a far cry from perpetual motion.
I've only read the one article about it, but if the science actually does hold up they've only created a more efficient electric motor system.
 
I'm not selling this stuff or promoting it but please visit the site and view the info rather than just dismissing it out of hand: The guy says quite openly that there is no such thing as free energy!


Read through the stuff and watch the videos; I dunno if he's genuine or not but at least give him the benefit of the doubt until you have read/watched the presentations etc.

If it's a pile of poo, we'll soon find out; read and listen etc and then give a view.

I may be a naive person but I'm prepared to wait for the big presentation in September to see if it's all a scam.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom