But the postie did drop this off
Nice, sore much
No, my 5 Mil left me sore for weeks, but since then I have been preparing myself for when the 10 mil comes through later in the year cos that suckers gonna hurt bigtime
from the seti news post
In addition to gaining developer time, we will take advantage of public server outages to run the science servers at full bore, getting all of the database resources. So science production, as well as science development, will increase.
Thanks for the news TT, though your tiffy winners list is somewhat incomplete.
With regards to the new server outage schedule, I think it's a great idea. Whilst I completely agree that some users may leave the project out of sheer frustration, increased downtime to help troubleshoot problems should go some way to helping the long-term future of the project, as a lasting solution does need to be found instead of the quick fixes that have been seemingly been happening for some time.
I totally agree.......
It may be hard to stomach - but if it helps the cause........
On that note then, is there an easy way to automatically fetch relevant milestone data between a user-defined period of time? At the moment a lot of info is missing and other milestones aren't applicable to us here because we don't have certificates for them.
The tiffies aren't generated as such - they were created a while back by Berserker (I think) and are set at (and limited to) the following milestones:
100
250
500
750
1,000
2,500
5,000
7,500
10,000
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
250,000
500,000
750,000
1,000,000
and then every 250,000 after that. At the moment I simply use this page to manually sift through who's won what certificate. Unfortunately, that page omits quiite a few of the milestones that we have certificates for whilst listing ones that are irrelevant.
A script that I could run on our stats data that would perform a search for members that have passed the milestones listed above within a specified time range would be perfect, but I have no programming skills whatsoever so am limited to just doing it manually on an incomplete stats list. Whether or not the idea you suggest would work is beyond me, but if that was possible then it would certainly be a better option than I currently have.