It doesn't surprise me much that you don't understand. It's correct to blame the person who is directly responsible for inviting the rapist into Europe
I do understand, what I'm saying is that it'd idiocy. You blame people for the things that they specifically do, not people in the chain of events because a bad person did a bad thing.
So as I said before, the kid's parents are just to blame based on that utterly broken logic.
Where i have i said anything about a persons ethnicity? That's right i haven't, you're the one fixated on it
Where did I say you specifically?
Most people on this board are being objective, your selective blindness doesn't help anyone
Most people on these board wouldn't know objectivity if it ran into them with a bus.
Sound like some here has a superiority complex
A superiority complex doesn't change whether people are thick or not.
When you call people that have those concerns as uneducated and thick, you're by definition saying they're invalid
No it doesn't. Had I said that their concerns specifically makes them thick, then yeah you might be right. I'm pointing out that their concerns go one step further and fixate on the immigrant component. There are concerns, and then there are reasons for specific concerns. I'm talking about the reasoning, not the specific concerns.
You like logic?
Immigrant rapes boy. Therefore if immigrant wasn't in country, boy remains unraped. If immigrant wasn't invited into country, immigrant not in country. Merkle and her cronies invites immigrants into Europe.
QED
Yes, if he wasn't in this country, it wouldn't have happened. But that is EXACTLY the same as if he wasn't at the swimming pool, it wouldn't have happened as well.
You can't say one is correct whilst dismissing the other. If all circumstances play a part in the outcome, then those circumstances are also to "blame" based on bad logic.