OK mods let's see if you are prepared to do your job in this thread or not.
Here you go champ:
OK mods let's see if you are prepared to do your job in this thread or not.
I see the same old stirrers can’t resist having a pop, no surprise there
Apologies for the hospice situation but one must not stoop to their level of name calling sirI see the same old stirrers
It doesn't work when they have favourites who are exempt from the rules for one reason or another, maybe Elon is in the room with themHere you go champ:
@lovelyhead Those are not personal attacks. They are attacks on your content.
Your agenda is - in fact - very silly though.OK mods let's see if you are prepared to do your job in this thread or not.
Makes sense, hadn't even thought of wanting to keep musk convo to the other thread. I still think it might have been best to not change someone's post but to make another topic for a poll in that case but I can see how it could happen this way.Excuse me for not posting earlier, I’m sitting in a hospice waiting…. It’s not nice.
Yes, I edited the first post (not the thread subject) when I unlocked the thread and posted this. The original question was whether Twitter should be banned and as we wanted to keep Musk discussion out of the thread and in the SC thread, I removed the comment about him from the first post.
You don’t like it? Tough. I stand by my edit and my reopening of this thread.
I see the same old stirrers can’t resist having a pop, no surprise there
Excuse me for not posting earlier, I’m sitting in a hospice waiting…. It’s not nice.
Yes, I edited the first post (not the thread subject) when I unlocked the thread and posted this. The original question was whether Twitter should be banned and as we wanted to keep Musk discussion out of the thread and in the SC thread, I removed the comment about him from the first post.
You don’t like it? Tough. I stand by my edit and my reopening of this thread.
I see the same old stirrers can’t resist having a pop, no surprise there
Feek edited a post which removed key context about 70 posts in. A gaggle of right-leaning mods missed the context and couldn't understand why Hero Elon was being discussed. Accusations of me being an idiot went wild. Conjecture that Feek thought it was a typo because why would anyone dislike Elon. Nazi salutes. Reddit is not a forum. OCUK is not a shop.Ohhh, what did I miss?
Thanks for the summary but we should probably keep the timeline limited to this thread xAccusations of me being an idiot went wild.
I threw that in to give Diddums something to do!Thanks for the summary but we should probably keep the timeline limited to this thread x
Hey. So ocuk isn’t Reddit. Just thought I’d give you a heads up.NBA has gone full blown anti Lord Elon and anti Lord Zuckerberg. Is this allowable expansion to topic or also banned?
But if you don't report them, how will we know?It doesn't work when they have favourites who are exempt from the rules for one reason or another, maybe Elon is in the room with them
If you’re unhappy with how the mods are tending the forum..then leave I guess.
No. The key question is whether or not Twitter should be allowed on the forum or not. That’s exactly what the thread title says.Feek edited a post which removed key context about 70 posts in.
Bit dramatic, it's not quite World War 3.I think OCUK will be on the wrong side of history of this one. I'll drop back in to say "told you so!".
What ??? You’ve outright asked for twitter or X to be banned.It's not possible to have a civilised debate