Sure, why not? Doesn't harm anyone else does it? A lot less than alcohol I'd imagine...
If people want to smoke a natural narcotic, and as long as they don't harm anyone else whilst doing it, fine as far as Im concerned. Lot's of people do it anyway - as said, why not have that money going to the government through taxation, rather than to the black market? Pharmaceutical companies will get hold of it, market it, and make money from it and a whole new industry could be born through the processing of safe, refined narcotics for domestic use.
I think a lot of people play the "but it can harm users!!" card a bit much. So what? Why should the nanny state have to lay down laws and regulations to protect citizens from themselves? Alcohol is arguably worse as a drug, especially in volume, and smoking is known to increase the risk of cancer and degrade your health, yet it isn't banned. People are made aware of the risks and allowed to choose whether or not to partake in consumption. Why cant it be the same with light drugs?
Im not a drug user...I've never even so much as smoked a cigarette, and although I used to drink quite regularly, I do so a hell of a lot less now, so this isn't an opinion borne or my own desire for easy access to drugs.
Quite frankly, anyone who thinks legalising drugs is a good idea is a moron.
What a ridiculous statement. Why are they are a moron, because they disagree with you? You have witnessed a disastrous personal loss as a result of a drug use, and you have my sympathy, but to then discount the millions of people who use drugs every day with little or no ill effect and to brand anyone who disagrees with your own personal opinion a "moron" is bordering on offensive and doing your argument no favours.