Should women's sports have separate websites on BBC Sport, Sky News, etc.?

IP6Z5Gv.png


Hi Emma. In my experience, women are just as sexist as men; the only difference is that nobody gives a **** about women's football, which makes you cross.

Also - definitely the most important sporting story in the world today. BBC just cannot understand the difference between sport and socio-political, which makes their website even more stupid. I guess they now have a cohort of Gen Z junior editors hell bent on purveying social messages rather than sport.
 
Participant said:
IP6Z5Gv.png


Hi Emma. In my experience, women are just as sexist as men; the only difference is that nobody gives a **** about women's football, which makes you cross.

Also - definitely the most important sporting story in the world today. BBC just cannot understand the difference between sport and socio-political, which makes their website even more stupid. I guess they now have a cohort of Gen Z junior editors hell bent on purveying social messages rather than sport.
Click to expand...

You've got a lot of hate for a rando on the internet
 
I have to say it would be nice to separate men and women's football on bbc sport football page, constantly getting confused when i see a headline like arsenal beat man city 10-0! Only to realise it's the women's football! I could then just bookmark the men's page and vise versa.
 
Someone was correct about the editors of the pages.... Agenda basesd.

But back to point.

No one cares as its ****
 
Participant said:
Just wondering whether people think women's sports should be moved onto separate dedicated websites, rather than intermingled with men's sports articles?

This will allow all those people eager to find articles about women's sports to find them very easily, rather than having to sift through a load of male sports articles.
Click to expand...
Yeah I think that's a good idea. Just makes it easier to find what you want and quicker. Like clothing, it's seperated out for ease (mens clothing and womens clothing) it isn't all chucked under one big banner. Seems logical to me to do the same with sport.
 
SPG said:
Someone was correct about the editors of the pages.... Agenda basesd.

But back to point.

No one cares as its ****
Click to expand...
This thread is just as agenda driven given the OP keeps wilfully misinterpreting and misrepresenting things to make a point.

The progress women’s football and sport in general has made in the last five years is huge in terms of both standard and viewers and it’s great to see.
 
Doesn't take away the fact it's still crap though. Attendances prove it.

Too much football coverage in the UK, Mad Murdoch has seen to that.
 
SPG said:
Doesn't take away the fact it's still crap though. Attendances prove it.

Too much football coverage in the UK, Mad Murdoch has seen to that.
Click to expand...
Average attendance for United women is >10,000 which is higher than the average League One attendance and is itself a well attended league.
GIBURROWS said:
I saw recently on the Chelsea ad boards that they want £15 a ticket for the women's champions league games which to me is crazy, it used to be £5 to watch league games!!!
Click to expand...
My local non league team is £6 to get in and average gate is about 400 people so £15 seems like a bargain tbf.
 
Fair enough, I must totally be the odd one out then as i really couldn't care less about woman's football. But yes it needs it own section in the BBC rather than forced down my throat.
 
SPG said:
Doesn't take away the fact it's still crap though. Attendances prove it.
Click to expand...
and ticket prices..

NUFC womans was a fiver on the door when they hosted a game at the mens stadium, I tnink it was 3.50 if you booked in advance
US Women Vs Wrexham :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
Women Vs boys

:cry:
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom