• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Show Off Your Call Of Duty Warzone Graphics Performance

Jay-G25 said:
I've always found this runs smooth as silk for me... these are not my normal setting as i normally play at 4k but for the purpose of this benchmark copied your exact settings although just realised its a quads game on resurgence but i doubt that will change thing much as same map :D

Game Mode : Resurgence Quads
Resolution : 1440p
Image Quality: Maximum, but with RT/Blur/DepthofField/Grain Off
CPU: i9-10900K
GPU: RTX3090 Strix Oc
Click to expand...
Great video, thanks for the contribution. :)
 
michty_me said:
I'm liking looking at everyones videos here.
I'm in the process of trying to order a new graphics card so this gives me a good idea of what each card is doing. in Warzone. Its the main game I'm playing. It appears the 3090 has a good amount of frames higher than the 6900XT.
I'm currently using a vega 56 at 1440p Normal settings and usually fluctuate somewhere in the region of 85-125fps.

Anyone gaming on Warzone at 1440P with a 3080?
Click to expand...

I had a 3080fe for a short period before I got the 3090 and from memory it was doing 180 to 200 fps at 1440p ultra setting... certainly more than enough for most tbh :D
 
Doubt it, the new And cards don't like Warzone in my experience.

I've got a 3600x / 6800 and get between 120-160 at 1080p Low. Not far off what I used to get with my Vega64 and my friends 5700xt is seemingly better.

Probably a combination of CPU limitations, 1080p not stretching the 6800 enough and dodgy new drivers.
 
This should slap Warzone around a fair bit :D

image.png


:D
 
@LtMatt I run exactly the same settings as you but 3440 x 1440 res and limit fps to 90 as using 100Hz Gsync screen.
I also use Geforce experience game filter settings for things like sharpening

What custom framerate limits do you have enabled?

I'll get a vid later showing my settings and performance how I usually play but cost of the time fps is 90 do to cap for gsync
 
Guest2 said:
@LtMatt I run exactly the same settings as you but 3440 x 1440 res and limit fps to 90 as using 100Hz Gsync screen.
I also use Geforce experience game filter settings for things like sharpening

What custom framerate limits do you have enabled?

I'll get a vid later showing my settings and performance how I usually play but cost of the time fps is 90 do to cap for gsync
Click to expand...
I used to let it run uncapped, so i think it goes up to 300 or so? But just recently I've started locking the FPS to 98 or 99, it actually seems to make things even smoother and reduce latency so i can see why you do it.
 
LtMatt said:
I used to let it run uncapped, so i think it goes up to 300 or so? But just recently I've started locking the FPS to 98 or 99, it actually seems to make things even smoother and reduce latency so i can see why you do it.
Click to expand...

I meant to write "but *most* of the time..."

Warning though, there is a huge flaw in recent Nvidia drivers since Nvidia reflex was introduced. Capping FPS will make CPU time ms (latency) shoot up about 7ms or it does for me. from 4ms to around 11ms when running 90fps capped. This is reduced to 3 or 4ms when running uncapped but this is horrible and causes tearing when using Gsync due to fps going over the Gsync Hz.

Even disabling reflex (or enabling) the CPU latency is high when capping fps.

For this reason im running 445.87 Nvidia driver which does not have Reflex, 90fps cap and low latency. I've done a lot of testing with this and can find no other way of reducing the latency. For me 11ms CPU latency feels like turning Gsync off completely and is even worse than the tearing caused by running unlimited fps
 
Guest2 said:
I meant to write "but *most* of the time..."

Warning though, there is a huge flaw in recent Nvidia drivers since Nvidia reflex was introduced. Capping FPS will make CPU time ms (latency) shoot up about 7ms or it does for me. from 4ms to around 11ms when running 90fps capped. This is reduced to 3 or 4ms when running uncapped but this is horrible and causes tearing when using Gsync due to fps going over the Gsync Hz.

Even disabling reflex (or enabling) the CPU latency is high when capping fps.

For this reason im running 445.87 Nvidia driver which does not have Reflex, 90fps cap and low latency. I've done a lot of testing with this and can find no other way of reducing the latency. For me 11ms CPU latency feels like turning Gsync off completely and is even worse than the tearing caused by running unlimited fps
Click to expand...

Running with reflex increases your cpu ms to match your gpu ms which is why its shooting up ... turn off reflex and as you noticed cpu ms drops to 2/3/4 ms while the gpu ms will do its own thing ... pretty sure it's normal behaviour for the ms to increase with reflex enabled as I was under the assumption it works by keeping your gpu and cpu in tandem:confused:
 
Jay-G25 said:
Running with reflex increases your cpu ms to match your gpu ms which is why its shooting up ... turn off reflex and as you noticed cpu ms drops to 2/3/4 ms while the gpu ms will do its own thing ... pretty sure it's normal behaviour for the ms to increase with reflex enabled as I was under the assumption it works by keeping your gpu and cpu in tandem:confused:
Click to expand...

Nope. With Reflex on or off the CPU time shoots up. Only when running unlimited FPS does it drop back to 4ms
Old drivers I have it off and it runs fine with capped FPS.
I tried a few drivers and it seems to be about from 456.XX driver were it breaks (when Reflex was introduced)
 
Guest2 said:
Nope. With Reflex on or off the CPU time shoots up. Only when running unlimited FPS does it drop back to 4ms
Old drivers I have it off and it runs fine with capped FPS.
I tried a few drivers and it seems to be about from 456.XX driver were it breaks (when Reflex was introduced)
Click to expand...

How high is your ms going ?

I've just tried a few options and this is what i was getting on the latest drivers ...

Reflex disable , unlimited framerate : gpu 4ms / cpu 3ms
Reflex enabled . unlimited framerate : gpu 4ms / cpu 4ms
Reflex disable , custom 180fps : gpu 5ms / cpu 6ms
Reflex enabled custom 180fps : gpu 5ms / cpu 5ms
 
TripleT said:
Doubt it, the new And cards don't like Warzone in my experience.

I've got a 3600x / 6800 and get between 120-160 at 1080p Low. Not far off what I used to get with my Vega64 and my friends 5700xt is seemingly better.

Probably a combination of CPU limitations, 1080p not stretching the 6800 enough and dodgy new drivers.
Click to expand...

Similar setup to you 3600 and an RX6800 but running at 1440p everything Low according to the Radeon software I'm averaging 123fps, was expecting a bit more.
 
Jay-G25 said:
I've always found this runs smooth as silk for me... these are not my normal setting as i normally play at 4k but for the purpose of this benchmark copied your exact settings although just realised its a quads game on resurgence but i doubt that will change thing much as same map :D

Game Mode : Resurgence Quads
Resolution : 1440p
Image Quality: Maximum, but with RT/Blur/DepthofField/Grain Off
CPU: i9-10900K
GPU: RTX3090 Strix Oc
Click to expand...
Brooooo, your FOV (field of view) is horrible. Thats got to be similar to a consoles view.

P.S I'm jealous of your max settings and FPS :'(
 
Game Mode: Mini Royale quads
Resolution: 3440 x 1440
Image Quality: Maximum, but with RT/Blur/DepthofField/Grain Off
CPU: 5800X
GPU: 2080 Ti

HD video is uploading now. Youtube downscales 3440 x 1440 to 1080p
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom