Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2004
- Posts
- 2,981
- Location
- Herts, UK
Because the hardware is so much more reliable now than in the past, and performance differences are as small as they've ever been - the championship is more down to the driver these days. This is surely a good thing, no?
In equal machinery, for sure the driver has more input, but if you take the current RB and the current Ferrari, they are quite difference in performance, going from qualifying pace.
Actually, it is because of the improvement in reliability, that the lower teams are closer than previously. Where before a team had to run slower to avoid engine failures, they can now run closer to their limit, knowing components are not going to fail as often.
This does not mean though, that the lower teams are any closer to the top teams in getting points/wins. Decades ago, the bottom teams were about two or three laps down by the end of a race. Currently, the bottom teams are about two or three laps down by the end of the race. I.E. no real change.
If you were to average out everything, team performance might be marginally closer at the mid to top than previously, but the reliance on aero means how a team starts their design has a massive effect on performance, and the type of track also has a massive effect on how affective the design is.
In the past, for example, if the Ferrari engine in car A had more horsepower than the Cosworth in car B, car A would be more successful than car B no matter what track. Now even though the Mercedes and Ferrari engines are proven to be faster than the Renault engine, because Red Bull have different aero styles, they are faster than other cars even in a straight line at Spa/Monza, whereas you just can't tell where other teams might be quick.