Fair enoughPhil W said:I wasn't born for 5, but i still think its awesome in that condition![]()
I find it hard to believe that E reg cars are nearly 20 years old, it seems so soon since they were new
Damn good cars.[TW]Fox said:Don't know how my car ends up in every thread even when I don't mention it but never mind. Took mine up on the winding North Yorkshire moorland roads yesterday. It was absolutely awesome and never once did I wish I was in an old Fiesta. Cornered amazingly well and then shifted on on the straights and had the power to overtake whenever there was a suitable straight
Although like I said, what is my car doing in this thread anyway![]()
Harshpenski said:I hadn't thought about it previously but I just realised that your bimmer only has 150bhp/tonne.
Ouch.
*n
(but true)dirtydog said:Harsh(but true)
penski said:Indeed...Which is, oddly enough, the same as a 120bhp XR2...
*n
LOL, what a wounder. Because Fox felt the need to post in the thread and denegrate the XR2?-Mike- said:The bmw design is rather newer. Sorry but why are we playing defend and pick holes in the BMW. Who cares about fox's bmw in this thread its about a xr2.

Anyways, a lot of people have asked me how i can downgrade from my old Turbo Rover to this.. well i can tell you one thing, i can safely say the rover handles like a boat in comparrison
Ive always wanted one ever since my old man had XR3's etc.
I was 2 when this car was made
loldirtydog said:In fairness isn't a 1.6 carb XR2 about 100 bhpAnd 0-60 in around 9.5 secs. (I seem to remember my Sierra 2.0iS being faster)
Yeah but I meant as standardpenski said:120bhp isn't too difficult to achieve from a CVH...
*n
Even as standard it had a decent bit of poke though
for what it was.dirtydog said:In fairness isn't a 1.6 carb XR2 about 100 bhpAnd 0-60 in around 9.5 secs. (I seem to remember my Sierra 2.0iS being faster)