• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

SOME RYZEN 7 1700 OVERCLOCKING!

I found this Posted 2 months ago , If you not seen it ,
The Silicon Lottery released their binned Ryzen CPUs today and included the following statistics in their product pages. This gives us more of an idea on the differences among the lineup in terms of overclocking potential and should help us set our expectations. AMD has clearly squeezed as many MHz out of their CPUs as the process allows.

Ryzen 7 1700
93% reach 3.8GHz @ 1.376V
70% reach 3.9GHz @ 1.408V
20% reach 4.0GHz @ 1.440V

Ryzen 7 1700X
100% reach 3.8GHz @ 1.360V
77% reach 3.9GHz @ 1.392V
33% reach 4.0GHz @ 1.424V

Ryzen 7 1800X
100% reach 3.8GHz (assumed)
97% reach 3.9GHz @ 1.376V
67% reach 4.0GHz @ 1.408V
20% reach 4.1GHz @ 1.440V

Note:
Their test setup used the Realbench stress test for 1 hour on an Asus Crosshair VI, cooled by a Corsair H105 with 2 X 8GB of 2400MHz CL15 RAM.
 
Darren_uk said:
I found this Posted 2 months ago , If you not seen it ,
The Silicon Lottery released their binned Ryzen CPUs today and included the following statistics in their product pages. This gives us more of an idea on the differences among the lineup in terms of overclocking potential and should help us set our expectations. AMD has clearly squeezed as many MHz out of their CPUs as the process allows.

Ryzen 7 1700
93% reach 3.8GHz @ 1.376V
70% reach 3.9GHz @ 1.408V
20% reach 4.0GHz @ 1.440V

Ryzen 7 1700X
100% reach 3.8GHz @ 1.360V
77% reach 3.9GHz @ 1.392V
33% reach 4.0GHz @ 1.424V

Ryzen 7 1800X
100% reach 3.8GHz (assumed)
97% reach 3.9GHz @ 1.376V
67% reach 4.0GHz @ 1.408V
20% reach 4.1GHz @ 1.440V

Note:
Their test setup used the Realbench stress test for 1 hour on an Asus Crosshair VI, cooled by a Corsair H105 with 2 X 8GB of 2400MHz CL15 RAM.
Click to expand...

Woohoo! I have a top 20% 1700 :D

I'd try pushing it higher on the crosshair, but things are just too darn temperamental still.
 
The original batch sold out unfortunately. I mentioned that may be the case in the memory thread.

If it was CL14 then the only ICs available would really be Samsung.
 
Jokester said:
So really is as little of 100MHz difference in what to expect.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I'd take those figures with a pinch of salt however. I can run realbench at 3.9 and 4.0 but its not stable in anything else :p

eyetrip said:
Woohoo! I have a top 20% 1700 :D

I'd try pushing it higher on the crosshair, but things are just too darn temperamental still.
Click to expand...

Yeah I'm slowly learning it, things are improving however ;
er0cw1.png


Not fully stable at CL14 @3500, next step 3600 CL16!
 
gavinh87 said:
Yeah, I'd take those figures with a pinch of salt however. I can run realbench at 3.9 and 4.0 but its not stable in anything else :p



Yeah I'm slowly learning it, things are improving however ;
er0cw1.png


Not fully stable at CL14 @3500, next step 3600 CL16!
Click to expand...

and here i am still suck on 2933mhz with samsung B die, single rank :'(
 
prjwebb said:
I'm 3.85ghz @1.4v
timings are 14 14 14 34 1.35v vram
soc 1.1v

i've tried dram at 1.45v and soc at 1.2v with really loose timings and still get the boot loop. only thing i haven't played with are termination voltages really.
Click to expand...

I had issues with booting into windows with any increase of the blck until I increased to PLL voltage to 1.9v.
Have you tried messing with procodt?
 
It does look a little limited in options compared to the crosshair. As said the things that helped me were PLL voltage and procodt. Soc does nothing for me tbh. I you don't have anything like this in your biosyour best bet is waiting for the next agesa update.
 
Yeah, that's what I've been thinking. I'm hoping next week it'll be as simple as clicking XMP, but we shall see.

Are there any alternative names for PLL and procodt?
 
Darren_uk said:
I found this Posted 2 months ago , If you not seen it ,
The Silicon Lottery released their binned Ryzen CPUs today and included the following statistics in their product pages. This gives us more of an idea on the differences among the lineup in terms of overclocking potential and should help us set our expectations. AMD has clearly squeezed as many MHz out of their CPUs as the process allows.

Ryzen 7 1700
93% reach 3.8GHz @ 1.376V
70% reach 3.9GHz @ 1.408V
20% reach 4.0GHz @ 1.440V

Ryzen 7 1700X
100% reach 3.8GHz @ 1.360V
77% reach 3.9GHz @ 1.392V
33% reach 4.0GHz @ 1.424V

Ryzen 7 1800X
100% reach 3.8GHz (assumed)
97% reach 3.9GHz @ 1.376V
67% reach 4.0GHz @ 1.408V
20% reach 4.1GHz @ 1.440V

Note:
Their test setup used the Realbench stress test for 1 hour on an Asus Crosshair VI, cooled by a Corsair H105 with 2 X 8GB of 2400MHz CL15 RAM.
Click to expand...
This tells me the 1700 is still the best bet - cheaper and money difference can be put towards gpu power!

my 3.9GHz at 1.38 feels so good with low temps. Not going to loose sleep over this 4.0Ghz thingy , yet mine can but is not stable. another bios might change that. I Think anyone should be happy with the cheap 1700 doing 3.7 - 4.00. That's one hell of a c pu for the price. I might even set mine up for 3.7 and see what lower vt i can get!
 
laddy said:
This tells me the 1700 is still the best bet - cheaper and money difference can be put towards gpu power!

my 3.9GHz at 1.38 feels so good with low temps. Not going to loose sleep over this 4.0Ghz thingy , yet mine can but is not stable. another bios might change that. I Think anyone should be happy with the cheap 1700 doing 3.7 - 4.00. That's one hell of a c pu for the price. I might even set mine up for 3.7 and see what lower vt i can get!
Click to expand...

Yeah I have seen this, thing is realbench is not a good indicator of stability. I'd take those figures with a pinch of salt.

prjwebb said:
Looking at my bios I have a CPUVDD18 which is default 1.8v. I wonder if that is what the PLL is called in this bios?
Click to expand...

I imagine so, as PLL is 1.8v by default. Setting it .1v higher wont break anything so give it a try.
 
This is what I am running at the moment, a CH6 with a 1700 and T-Force Xtreem 3600 2x8GB memory :-

FSB : 100.00
Multiplyer : x38
Memort Freq : DDR4-2933MHz
Core V : 1.400
SOC V : 1.15
DRAM V : 1.35
PLL V : 1.89
Memory : 16-16-16-32

Same settings are also stable with memory set at 14-14-14-36 and 14-14-13-36 but CineBench gave lower scores. I did also manage to get the memory up to 3050 with an FSB clock of 104, sadly RealBench kept crashing, could be the graphics driver as screen went blank, came back and all graphics adapter monitoring and values go to zero even though CPU still pegged at 100%, I could exit and reboot without any further fuss, CineBench worked with these values.

Also runs happily at x39 giving me 3.9Ghz but didnt seem worth the extra heat and voltage.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom