Some T-Shirts are against the law!

[Ryan-3]

But the BLM one would get more attention, more outrage (left of course).

The only people who wouldn't get annoyed by seeing this are those who are racist?

Equally, two fingers to Boris could just be for the unanimous vote against regular health care worker testing. You know those people we all care about and clapped for...

I think you would need a very large T-Shirt adequately to list Johnson's failings - a marquee would seem essential.

Personally I don't hate Johnson, I just despise the utterly dishonest, arrogant, bumbling buffoon.

Maybe hire a bus, write it on the side?

 

[Martynt74]

Equally, two fingers to Boris could just be for the unanimous vote against regular health care worker testing. You know those people we all care about and clapped for...

And then instantly forget about as soon as the sun comes out for protests and beach parties

 

[Deleted member 77746]

So does this mean FCUK clothes are now offensive because dyslexics exist?

No FCUK stands for french connection UK.

 

[GhostWKD]

In fairness if I was walking around in the middle of the day with a tshirt printed with the word **** on it I'd expect to maybe be pulled up on it.

I have a tshirt from a bar in Prague which has "Adios Mother ****ers" printed on it, naturally it's only really worn indoors as it'd be pretty rude to wear out in public in the middle of the day...

 

[wolfie138]

so is my "jesus is a ****" shirt likely to be at risk?

 

[Ryan-3]

And then instantly forget about as soon as the sun comes out for protests and beach parties

Yay, go us! #BluePassportsMatter

 

[stockhausen]

. . . Maybe hire a bus, write it on the side?

You're gonna need a bigger bus!
Maybe a few redundant liar control water cannon?

 

[adolf hamster]

He's a politican, when you choose that career you de-facto open yourself up to public scrutiny.

Some of that is going to be expressed by love and support, some of it is going to be hatred and scorn.

It shouldnt come as a surprise to anyone regardless of what your personal opinion of boris is that this sort of opinion is going to be voiced, all this person's done is save themselves the trouble of actually saying it.

 

[cheesyboy]

I think there's an appropriate time to wear a F-Boris T-shirt. And a protest is certainly that time. I certainly wouldn't expect someone with a banner saying F-Boris to be rounded up by the police.

In normal day to day life, I think it's probably not appropriate to wear very sweary T-shirts. I'm not sure that I feel strongly enough to support police intervention, though.

 

[Hagar]

I think there's an appropriate time to wear a F-Boris T-shirt. And a protest is certainly that time. I certainly wouldn't expect someone with a banner saying F-Boris to be rounded up by the police.

In normal day to day life, I think it's probably not appropriate to wear very sweary T-shirts. I'm not sure that I feel strongly enough to support police intervention, though.

Actually yes you should expect a police intervention whenever you used the F word printed out in public. Otherwise apart from politicians you would get the Pope, the Queen (not even the Sex Pistols went that far), Nelson Mandela, well he's dead. You get the drift, it is intended to incite violence by the wearer, on the wearer who would likely retaliate in kind.

 

[NVP]

What she did on “most” instances is tell the truth of current situation.

Hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahzhzhzhahzhzbxjxhdhzhhzhzhz

 

[Freakbro]

Hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahzhzhzhahzhzbxjxhdhzhhzhzhz

He earned the moniker McdriveL for a reason

 

[Yadda]

So what's the score now then - is it ok to be "offended by words" or not?

 

[cheesyboy]

Actually yes you should expect a police intervention whenever you used the F word printed out in public. Otherwise apart from politicians you would get the Pope, the Queen (not even the Sex Pistols went that far), Nelson Mandela, well he's dead. You get the drift, it is intended to incite violence by the wearer, on the wearer who would likely retaliate in kind.

I think arresting people at protests for displaying the F word is inappropriate. I'm not arguing on whether it is the law or not, but that it simply shouldn't be so.

 

[Zefan]

I think arresting people at protests for displaying the F word is inappropriate. I'm not arguing on whether it is the law or not, but that it simply shouldn't be so.

I agree, it isn't practical or a good use of police resource. People should expect to be exposed to civil unrest at a protest, but is isn't acceptable for it to be on display just walking down the street.

 

[Surveyor]

I think arresting people at protests for displaying the F word is inappropriate. I'm not arguing on whether it is the law or not, but that it simply shouldn't be so.

She wasn't arrested.

 

[cheesyboy]

She wasn't arrested.

That's because she covered it up. After being told by police she was breaching the law.

Make that my argument, then - that police shouldn't be pulling protesters aside to make them cover up the F word.

 

[NVP]

So law enforcement shouldn't actively inform the public about laws they're potentially in breach of, or ignorant to?

 

[stockhausen]

I would suggest that some of the less easily offended on here might like to seek out an Album titled "Incredible! Live Country Joe!" and have a listen to a track called "You know what I mean" . . . it is available on Spotify and even on YouTube

 

[cheesyboy]

So law enforcement shouldn't actively inform the public about laws they're potentially in breach of, or ignorant to?

Read carefully:

I'm not arguing on whether it is the law or not, but that it simply shouldn't be so.