Something going on at Microsoft HQ?

dont rule it out. the only reason the transfer speed is slow is because of the rotational speed fo the bluray readers. think about it - ps'3 are pretty much silent when reading. ill it takes is for them to improve the read accuracy and spindle speed and it could quite possibly happen.
 
Blu-ray drives at present have a lower data transfer rate than the DVD drive built into the 360.

The PS3 one perhaps, but I can buy a 5x Blu-Ray drive which would be faster than 12x DVD drive. This is all completely theoretical, as who would know what speed drive MS could/would install.

Whatever the case, you are right they would need to make sure it could sustain at least the data read rates that the Xbox DVD can do at the moment.
 
The PS3 one perhaps, but I can buy a 5x Blu-Ray drive which would be faster than 12x DVD drive. This is all completely theoretical, as who would know what speed drive MS could/would install.

True, but one of the main reasons the PS3 is so expensive when compared to the 360 is because of that blu-ray drive. If microsoft wanted to chuck a fast blu-ray drive into the 360 i bet it would increase the cost of manufacture hugely. The 360 is very popular at present as it is the cheapest HD console and the hardware offers pretty much the same things as the PS3 (in terms of gaming) for less money. To include a expensive blu-ray drive and push up the cost would nullify the marketing strategy they seem to be sticking to - which is a cheap console with several upgrade options.
 
Care to expand on that, does the read speed drop for the second layer? TBH my knowledge on the subject is limited to what I've read online over the last few days.

Edit: NVM, you ninja edited :D

its something to do with the different read strategies involved, here's a review of the pioneer bdc-202 http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Reviews/Specific.aspx?ArticleId=20773&PageId=1

near the bottom, about 3/4 down, you'll see the speeds for single layer and dual layer BD discs. for dual layers, the reader actively alters the spindle speed, slowing at the middle and returning at either end, so that you get a constant x2 read speed from the drive across the entire surface of the disc. thats in contrast with single layer discs, that start off at 2x and finish at 5x. so the actual average read is 3.9x
 

Interesting, not an easy subject to understand.

Another question then, surely when a DVD is popped into a Blu-Ray drive it switches to the old school red laser to read the disc and DVD read speeds apply, so that if MS did put in a Blu-Ray drive, it would still be slow for Blu-Ray, but fast enough for DVD, which is what all games would continue to be written on?
 
Thats the thing, if there was a 360 with built in Blu-Ray, then yes, it would have to be done with a double laser system do that the drive characteristics would remain unchanged. Otherwise, even a slight change could make some games stutter or worse.
 
HD-DVD Statement from Xbox
We do not believe the recent reports about HD DVD will have any material impact on the Xbox 360 platform or our position in the marketplace. As we’ve long stated, we believe it is games that sell consoles and Xbox 360 continues to have the largest next-gen games library with the most exclusives and best selling games in the industry. We will wait until we hear from Toshiba before announcing any specific plans around the Xbox 360 HD DVD player. HD DVD is one of the several ways we offer a high definition experience to consumers and we will continue to give consumers the choice to enjoy digital distribution of high definition movies and TV shows directly to their living room along with playback of the DVD movies they already own.

Games sell consoles, not movies ;)
 
Well i believe a GAMES CONSOLE is for games not movies..

Movies is DVD playa n **** crazy ass people
 
Interesting, not an easy subject to understand.

Another question then, surely when a DVD is popped into a Blu-Ray drive it switches to the old school red laser to read the disc and DVD read speeds apply, so that if MS did put in a Blu-Ray drive, it would still be slow for Blu-Ray, but fast enough for DVD, which is what all games would continue to be written on?

yes;) but thats something people dont seem to be thinking about:p
 
In fact, my divorced mother and father both bought a PS3 each for the specific reason to play blu rays. They don't play games. People always forget on this forum that we, are the hardcore, not the casual player.

Unlucky for me i don't live with them so i had to buy a PS3 of my own! Damn!

Josh
 
The 360 wi-fi is a/b/g, 'a' CAN stream it. It's a very good wi-fi adapter, and I would hazard that's the reason for the cost. Most people criticize it as if it's a run of the mill thing, it's not.

Yep. I use Wireless a and I stream HiDef content no problem.
 
If they sorted out the 360 with a new silent drive (like the PS3) then I would certainly be tempted to sell mine on and buy a new one!
 
Its the reason I will be buying one.

Same here unfortunately. The 360 is such an awful DVD player I will use my PS3 for both Blu Ray & DVD.
It seems like such a waste though buying a games console and not playing games on it...

Im not that much of a gamer as it is, I don't experiment much and only tend to buy highly rated games or games Ive seen my mates playing so I wouldn't be buying anything like that for a PS3 anytime soon
 
Back
Top Bottom