Associate
- Joined
- 24 Apr 2006
- Posts
- 477
- Location
- Dorset
Very Very Harsh penalty but its the sort of penalty that United at Old Trafford get 2 or 3 times a season so i guess there is some kind of karma there
did Mike phelan come out and say 'you can't argue with the referees decision' after this match....
If you mean the Terry penalty incident he always gets away with them, no ref would have gave it. I agree he got some other decisions wrong like the free kick which they almost scored from in the first half but his major **** ups came when it was 1-1
I am shocked he got this fixture two years on the spin after what happened last year, that's certainly something to question...
But Ferguson will blame the ref and not the players. But we got stuffed second half.
edit: it's also easy to forget the torres disallowed goal but both players were fouling each other so in some games that would have been allowed...
Had Poll been the ref he'd have booked Luiz for all 3 of those challenges too, still wouldn't have sent him off though![]()
True, however the players involved in the 'goal' played on and VDS motioned towards trying to save the shot before realising he was beaten.
Excellent in the first half........ Excellent, thats the word you would choose.
In the first half UTd had one shot on target, the goal, that came out of nothing, Chelsea had 4 shots on target in the first half. Utd only had 4 shots total in that "excellent" first half, 1 off target from the corner, one from Evra from further away than Rooney's goal and Nani had a blocked shot from outside the box aswell.
Excellent, not even remotely close, under seemingly little pressure from Chelsea for most of the half, one very very good chance for Malouda early that he passed to VDS, and then they had 3 shots on target just before half time. INbetween Chelsea were rubbish, but so were Utd, sure they got outside the box easily enough, it was a strange game. When your midfield had the ball Essien/Ramires/Lampard didn't get close to them, but you got to the final third and nothing, you had a single shot in 45 minutes that you dominated from inside the box, everything else was shooting from lack of options and there were only 4 shots total.
I'd call that anything but excellent, drab, poor, uncreative and not close to threatening.
In total including goals Utd had 9 shots in the game, 2 on target, and CHelsea had 20 shots, 7 on target.
Because they had double figure chances, how many corners while we had Fletcher punting the ball off the pitch and oshea looking really bad.
Did no one see an attempt to sink us from carrick when his alleged backpass went straight to Chelsea.he did similar in the Cl vs themtoo.
It was funny last night listening to Ferguson moaning about 'off the ball' incidents after saying this about the one at the weekend
"There is nothing in it. But what will happen, because it is Wayne Rooney, the press will raise a campaign to get him hung by Tuesday or electrocuted or something like that. It is unbelievable."
and so did Scholes, so did Rooney occasionally - but I dont see you blaming them do you![]()
It was funny last night listening to Ferguson moaning about 'off the ball' incidents after saying this about the one at the weekend
"There is nothing in it. But what will happen, because it is Wayne Rooney, the press will raise a campaign to get him hung by Tuesday or electrocuted or something like that. It is unbelievable."
Lets see how much the ones from last night get mentioned in the next few days.......
Whats the betting NOTHING gets mentioned