Soldato
Exactly. And don't forget, it triggers the usual brigade of Islamapologists if you dare say anything that criticises Islam/Muslims, even the ones that walk into Churches and detonate suicide vests.
Sri Lanka massacres
- Thread starter Dis86
- Start date
Exactly. And don't forget, it triggers the usual brigade of Islamapologists if you dare say anything that criticises Islam/Muslims, even the ones that walk into Churches and detonate suicide vests.
Soldato
Good point, I am a Christian and do actually find this ridiculous new term 'Easter Worshipper' quite offensive.
I believe you would be suspecting incorrectly
Wait what? Since when is "person of colour" banned? That's a politically correct term.
Wouldn't that be a Thursday-worshipper rather than a Thursday worshipper?
I have vague recollections of my O level English teacher explain the grammatical differences when using hyphens with the example between a dog lover (someone who loves dogs) and a dog-lover...and not to mix the two
You're telling me! I tried to explain that but was told that I was wrong, despite providing multiple links and dictionary definitions. I was told it doesn't matter and that if they decide it's offensive, it's offensive.
Permabanned
Political correctness personified. Islamapologists everywhere in the left wing and liberal world of media and celebrity personal. It’s a bit of a joke really. One way street.
Wouldn't that be a Thursday-worshipper rather than a Thursday worshipper?
I have vague recollections of my O level English teacher explain the grammatical differences when using hyphens with the example between a dog lover (someone who loves dogs) and a dog-lover...and not to mix the two
Hmm...I'd say no as the example playing in my mind was Satan worshipper. No hyphenation is required.
What about the ‘islamapologists’ on the right? The ones who happily vote for governments to support Saudi terror and thus the entire reason it’s so well funded?
Nah let’s ignore that cos muh libruls.
Lul wut? Show me the party manifesto that said that.
And both Labour and Tories were/are in bed with the Saudis.
Permabanned
Islamapologist is people who will not say a bad word about the, whatever They do. Even though I agree with you with parts of the right, they are not protecting them or apologising them as such. Which was the point of my reply to an earlier post.
Apparently Sri Lankans are being fined heavily for using a VPN at this time.
"The current situation is sri lanka! They r finning 10000lkr(~$60) for using vpn! Pray for sri lanka"
It’s called ‘reducing the damage from unsubstantiated reports’. India, Pakistan and probably all surrounding countries have a massive fake news problem.
As long as it’s limited in scope I don’t see the danger considering the potential danger of leaving it open. That said you also reduce the ability of the public to help forces, so it’s not great.
Apparently Sri Lankans are being fined heavily for using a VPN at this time.
"The current situation is sri lanka! They r finning 10000lkr(~$60) for using vpn! Pray for sri lanka"
Only a matter of time until this happens in the UK, take a few years but just watch
Consider me unsurprised that you'd be fine with such a measure.
Soldato
To be fair Sri Lanka has a "fake news" on social media system which is a million times worse than ours and now has an angry section of the population who react with violence more quickly than we do, so while I disagree with a ban in a perfect world, in the real one sadly I can see why the ban is in place until tempers settle.
Soldato
The problem with what you have written is this odd underlying assumption that without religion there would be an absence of all those things you consider bad.
I think "manipulation" and "authoritarianism" are omnipresent in our present godless hellhole of a society.
Godless? The vast majority of the planet believes in a god. You are incorrect.
Soldato
Unfortunately you just have to scroll down the list which shows the top posters in the thread and see why that happened.