Would Labour have been any different? None of the main parties promised to protect the DBIS budget...
Would Labour have been any different? None of the main parties promised to protect the DBIS budget...
They're selling RBS off on the cheap? Citation?
No but the LibDems prevented this last parliament. Perhaps their contribution to the coalition was more successful than they were given credit for?
There seems to be a stigma attached to education that isn't University. I don't understand where it has come from either. People my age should just speak to their parents in their era doing an apprenticeship was fine. There are plenty of successful people who didn't go to unviersity and there will still be plenty of successful people who don't go to university. Teenagers feel like they have to go to university to get anywhere in life and it just simply isn't true. In fact I would say as far as career progression goes for some people university would be detrimental!
The Lib Dem's enabled the Tories throughout the last parliament, that they resulted in a minority Tory government not getting a few policies through is hardly a recommendation - they would have got far less through without the Lib Dems backing them up.
The opportunities you had do not exist anymore (apart from the armed forces) without a degree and even then it's extremely competitive.
Yeah I know, I was just saying that undergrads (who get the grants) don't work that much for the entire year.
But I know some courses have a lot of contact hours and require a fair bit of independent study... but through a degree and two masters in two countries, I've known many good medics, engineers, scientists, and lawyers who've gained very good degrees but have still had time to travel, play a lot of sport, work, etc. I don't buy that undergrads who work well need to do 60 hours a week of uni work outside of exam periods.
I'm going to be controversial and say "good!".
Just because your parents earn more than the £32k or whatever the limit was combined, doesn't mean they're going to/be able to give you cash for University. I funded it all myself via part time jobs and the standard student loan except the odd food shop done by my parents. 2nd summer I done an internship. Why should someone with parents who earn half that of my own get a load of free money?
They should take loans like everyone else. If they do something where they earn a lot of money, they'll pay it back. If they decide to sit at home, they won't and it will effectively be a grant anyway.
I get that it was meant to be an incentive to get poor people to go to University but it doesn't work when its unfair and shafts others.
Note: More well off students will have parents who will pay for their fees/rent. Not much you can do about that. Just don't shaft those in the middle.
Ahh, sorry, I forgot your experience is representative of everyone everywhere. My bad.
One size does not fit all.
Poor people should not be educated.
So does that mean you'd rather see rich, stupid people in education and exclude intelligent, poorer people?
I didn't claim otherwise, but you do realise that applies both ways don't you? My argument isn't nonsense just because it's anecdotal.
I'm not suggesting otherwise. Some people can overcome really great barriers and be successful and well done to them. It doesn't mean those barriers should be there and that it's the right path for everyone.
Our economy depends on as many people being successful as possible.
Agreed. But good luck changing the World!
Would Labour have been any different? None of the main parties promised to protect the DBIS budget...
They're selling RBS off on the cheap? Citation?
So get a part time job to meet the difference? That's what I and many other people who didn't get grants did.