Subsidence

As in caused by trees? I've dealt with a few of these over my years. IF it is trees, the usual recommendation is cut them down!
 
As in caused by trees? I've dealt with a few of these over my years. IF it is trees, the usual recommendation is cut them down!
Its quite a bit further down the line then that, i know that my initial post didnt contain much detail. At this point we have had a final survey completed which was a floor slab distortion survey. Looks like a Topographical map, im just wondering what the scale of it is.

There is a long running back and forth between myself and the loss adjusters who are refusing to do anything about the persistent cause of the movement, even though evidence from their own readings and specifically this distortion survey (if im reading it correctly) show.
 
What is the cause accordng to the survey? Slab movement is usually undermined by something like water leak, big roots etc.
 
What is the cause accordng to the survey? Slab movement is usually undermined by something like water leak, big roots etc.
Chimney is central mass of the house, not built with any sort of foundation just on the floorslab, and we are on clay. House built in the 50's and really doesnt take much, with the more extreme dry summers and wet winters its just slowly getting worse.
 
I'm surprised that a property built in the 1950s doesn't have foundations to the chim. How have no foundations been established? Pulled the floors up?
Do the roots not rot, causing more subsidence?
No, the amount of moisture trees take up is far more of an issue than the roots rotting down. They rot slowly and are filled with other material and with more moisture in the soil (clay) it will be naturally "larger" anyway.
 
I'm surprised that a property built in the 1950s doesn't have foundations to the chim. How have no foundations been established? Pulled the floors up?
.

I'm not, depends if course, but a lot of houses built in the 50s were pretty poorly constructed, many considered "temporary" are still being lived in today, they needed to build a lot of houses quickly following a small disagreement with Germany a few years prior.
 
I'm not, depends if course, but a lot of houses built in the 50s were pretty poorly constructed, many considered "temporary" are still being lived in today, they needed to build a lot of houses quickly following a small disagreement with Germany a few years prior.

But but old houses were built better and new houses are terribly built...

Or in reality as I have said many times having live in a house from practically every decade from 1890s onwards, there is no perfect time, they all have issues.

Some of the 50s stuff was truly amazing. I forget the name of it now, but one of our rooves was built with what was basically straw and cement.
 
Excluding the lack of the foundation under the chimney the property is solid, which is a shame that we are having to go through all of this right now.
 
Just a little update on this one. After the floor distortion survey was completed the insurance tried to claim that the measurements were within tolerances. The movements the survey showed up were up to 50mm within a 3m distance, definitely not within any tolerance i could find, and further more not even close to the 15mm tolerance over a 10m span that the insurance company finally came back and quoted.

Needless today this further information was added to an already detailed case with the FOS who came to a final decision that the insurers where indeed liable for repair work to the floor and having finally gotten to an agreement on the scale of works required we are beginning to move forwards.

Funnily enough, i arrange for a floor specialist to provide a quote for rectification works, on the off chance the FOS would not side with us, and the insurance company asked for that quote. When they received if they were not happy with the costs, so they engaged with their own contractors.....the floor repair their own contracts have returned with is even more invasive and even more expensive. Needless to say we are going with their contractor.

The work that is now due to take place is full excavation and of the ground floor slab of the house and rebuild it to modern building regs standards which now include all the insulation bells and whistles to boot. This journey is going to get interesting, we are going to have to move out for 3-4 months.
 
Just a little update on this one. After the floor distortion survey was completed the insurance tried to claim that the measurements were within tolerances. The movements the survey showed up were up to 50mm within a 3m distance, definitely not within any tolerance i could find, and further more not even close to the 15mm tolerance over a 10m span that the insurance company finally came back and quoted.

Needless today this further information was added to an already detailed case with the FOS who came to a final decision that the insurers where indeed liable for repair work to the floor and having finally gotten to an agreement on the scale of works required we are beginning to move forwards.

Funnily enough, i arrange for a floor specialist to provide a quote for rectification works, on the off chance the FOS would not side with us, and the insurance company asked for that quote. When they received if they were not happy with the costs, so they engaged with their own contractors.....the floor repair their own contracts have returned with is even more invasive and even more expensive. Needless to say we are going with their contractor.

The work that is now due to take place is full excavation and of the ground floor slab of the house and rebuild it to modern building regs standards which now include all the insulation bells and whistles to boot. This journey is going to get interesting, we are going to have to move out for 3-4 months.

Yes thats good but also hassle. It'll be quite disruptive for a while.

Will be good once its sorted though.
 
Small update, in the phase of getting quotes from builders for the work we want doing that the insurance isnt paying out for.

There has been an issue with alternative accommodation requirements and it has also taken 3 months for the insurance company to agree that if the only viable property on the market has a 6 month minimum tenancy agreement period that they must agree to the full 6 months even if our build plan for the insurance works only requires 3-4 months. Finally had confirmation of this and funds for AA have now started to be paid out, so we can start planning properly for moving out and getting work started.

Next full detailed site visit from the insurers builders will take place mid/late January, so as things sit now I can see us moving out of the house around march next year for 6 months.
 
Rent alone is over £15k
Repair costs for their solution over mine is an additional £45k minimum (estimated costs of their repair £80k+, I provided a quote for £35k that wouldnt need AA)
Then there is the added cost of bills, removal costs, storage etc to be added on, thats easily going to be £5k+
 
Update:

Still on the hunt for a rental property. Rent funds have been paid out so far to cover 6 months rent, hopefully the amount paid out we can find somewhere that should gives us 8 months budget at least.

At the same time we are progressing with cash settlement talks - ive had my builder quote for the full work that the insurance company have spec'ed out and provided this to the insurance company.

Now the fun bit, the insurance company and I have discussed cash settlement from the start of this, baring in mind, initial rough estimates from a few different builders of the work that has been outlined by the insurance companies builders ranges from £65k-£100k.

1st settlement figure - £35k - no vat - no information given
2nd settlement figure - £47k - no vat upfront but as soon as works are completed i can claim back the vat - this is new and significant information, total settlement would be £56.4k.
3rd settlement figure - £68k - after vat thats £80.4k. They advised this new number after i had provided my quote - and at this point they also advised that they would be willing to settle the detailed quote that my builder has provided
My quote being £87.5k at this point + vat on top to claim back after - £105k

As my quote was provided before the insurance instructed builders came and completed a site walk around and highlighted some more work that needed to be undertaken, i have requested a revised quote from my builder to include those elements and advised the loss adjusters that I will be sending this over and they are just confirming that the builders did mention these points.

So amazingly without any information changing on the loss adjusters side, they have willing increased their cash settlement figure from £35k all the way up to £105k....

Its shocking what they have been trying to get away with.

Now waiting for the revised quote to land with me, to send over to the loss adjusters, with my likely preference to cash settle and have all works done by one main company coordinating.
 
Why doesn't the insurance company sort it all for you? Surely you pay your premium not just to be able to be reimbursed financially but for their expertise in sorting and arranging the work etc? Sounds like you have had to do a lot of organising?
 
Back
Top Bottom