Can you expand on what you mean by this?
AFAIK police officers do get the basics of common law and statute, you seem to be indicating possibly some sort of freeman of the land type misunderstanding here whereby statute doesn't really c count unless you consent to it or something?
What do you mean by this? Can you give an example of a police officer who is not a constable? (Are you getting them confused with police community support officers?)
I'm happy to be wrong on this, and learn by it, I research into loads of different topics because I want to know the truth. I see many big problems within our world and society, and I'm trying to figure things out, to be free, to not live in fear any more, to find the truth in everything. History always repeats itself and a lot of bad things has happened prior to us being here at this present time, and more bad things will happen in the future, as I said, I just want to find the truth from the world we live in, and find a real meaning to life.
The quote below is The principles which were set out in the ‘General Instructions’ that were issued to every new police officer from 1829.
- To prevent crime and disorder, as an alternative to their repression by military force and severity of legal punishment.
- To recognise always that the power of the police to fulfil their functions and duties is dependent on public approval of their existence, actions and behaviour and on their ability to secure and maintain public respect.
- To recognise always that to secure and maintain the respect and approval of the public means also the securing of the willing co-operation of the public in the task of securing observance of laws.
- To recognise always that the extent to which the co-operation of the public can be secured diminishes proportionately the necessity of the use of physical force and compulsion for achieving police objectives.
- To seek and preserve public favour, not by pandering to public opinion; but by constantly demonstrating absolutely impartial service to law, in complete independence of policy, and without regard to the justice or injustice of the substance of individual laws, by ready offering of individual service and friendship to all members of the public without regard to their wealth or social standing, by ready exercise of courtesy and friendly good humour; and by ready offering of individual sacrifice in protecting and preserving life.
- To use physical force only when the exercise of persuasion, advice and warning is found to be insufficient to obtain public co-operation to an extent necessary to secure observance of law or to restore order, and to use only the minimum degree of physical force which is necessary on any particular occasion for achieving a police objective.
- To maintain at all times a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and that the public are the police, the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.
- To recognise always the need for strict adherence to police-executive functions, and to refrain from even seeming to usurp the powers of the judiciary of avenging individuals or the State, and of authoritatively judging guilt and punishing the guilty.
- To recognise always that the test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, and not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with them.
From how I understand this, this represents the bobbys we had roaming our streets, probably before my time, they were apart of the community.
Policemen / policewomen's duty is to uphold the common law, to serve and protect, uphold the common law.
I believe the "general instructions" quoted above is why we believe the police work for us, as public servants.
Police "officers" are corperate employees, they collect revenue, and enforce the acts of parliament.
PCSO's dont hold an oath, i hear they have a warrant card, but not currently valid as they need an oath for it to be valid, they have no power over us.
No one has power over another human being.
Quote below is the policemans/womens oath.
I, do solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of constable with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality,and that I will uphold fundamental human rights and accord equal respect to all people, according to law.
An Act is a Bill that has been approved by both the House of Commons and the House of Lords and been given Royal Assent by the Monarch. Taken together, Acts of Parliament make up what is known as Statute Law in the UK.
So we have the basic common law, and then people in the "houses" make up these acts, and you break them, you pay.
Everything in this world is a business, the police stations, the courts, the councils, everything, and their aim is to make money, so we get penalized.
As said, I am willing to be wrong, but I am searching for the truth and a way out from this corruption.
