Today I learned that caring about maintaining the beauty of Britain's natural landscapes means I have self esteem issues.Any society overtly angry over a bit of wood is one with a chronic self-esteem problem.
Very little of Britain is natural, it's a very well presented garden though admittedly.Today I learned that caring about maintaining the beauty of Britain's natural landscapes means I have self esteem issues.
What?Here's a flaming hot take... Whatever form of capitalism we seem to have today (Adam Smith rolling in his grave) caused the smooth brain idea to cut down that tree because hard work is undervalued whilst being a loud, hypocritical edgelord seems to make some people very rich.
It was a wanton act of destruction that has diminished an iconic and beautiful place for no good reason other than the vandal's pleasure.Any society overtly angry over a bit of wood is one with a chronic self-esteem problem.
I think similar views will have already been expressed in this thread but I have two thoughts about this tree felling…
My immediate thought is that it’s totally senseless and deplorable, so I’m with everyone else on being disappointed about it.
My second thought is the general reaction says a lot about us as a society. It’s a beautiful tree in a pretty place but ultimately, it’s just a tree. Yet it’s easier to get upset about that than all the other terrible suffering that goes amongst us when humans are placed into imperfect situations (overseas war, migrants dying just for a chance to have what we have by birthright, people with addictions… and so on).
It’s probably something to do with this tree being more relatable than other things. Everyone likes a nice harmless tree, whereas maybe it’s the case that really awful things can’t be easily emotionally recognised unless they are right in front of your nose.
This though? It's hard to see any reason behind it other than just to be a ****, it's become something of a symbol of the fact that being a **** almost seems to be something to aspire to by many people these days
Bloody tree was asking for it.There are two sides to every story guys, please let's wait until the courts decide.
There are two sides to every story guys, please let's wait until the courts decide.
The latter for definite, the former I don't have enough evidence to say.You're saying it was felled by a person or persons that a bigot would likely suspect capable of such an act? Or are you just making a dreadfully crass pun?
I think it's also partly the fact that it's completely and utterly senseless.
The other examples you've given, whilst obviously worse overall, at least have some reasoning behind them (no matter how twisted that reasoning may be or how much you disagree with it).
This though? It's hard to see any reason behind it other than just to be a ****, it's become something of a symbol of the fact that being a **** almost seems to be something to aspire to by many people these days
There are two sides to every story guys, please let's wait until the courts decide.
Alright Shakespear. Don't give up the day job.Any society overtly angry over a bit of wood is one with a chronic self-esteem problem.
It was self-defence. The tree acted in a menacing way.
I did it so that it didn't fall on someone.
It was infested with invisible Sycamore beetles.
It was a way-point for an alien invasion.
Hmm....
Nope. I really can't think of any other side at all.
You're missingIt was self-defence. The tree acted in a menacing way.
I did it so that it didn't fall on someone.
It was infested with invisible Sycamore beetles.
It was a way-point for an alien invasion.
Hmm....
Nope. I really can't think of any other side at all.
There are two sides to every story guys, please let's wait until the courts decide.