Targeted strikes, precision bombs, pinpoint accuracy on to military installations blah blah blah
edit : ^ this is sarcasm btw
Poll: Syrian Chemical Weapon Attack
- Thread starter Craig1981
- Start date
Targeted strikes, precision bombs, pinpoint accuracy on to military installations blah blah blah
edit : ^ this is sarcasm btw
Yes, and we will use mission accomplished Iraq as the model for this 'humanitarian mission'.
That they didn't take our support kindly and still blow each other up on a daily basis is neither here nor there.
I demand my parliament make war, lots of it. The more death, the better.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-21061018
hopefully someone in parliament asks why we are helping people considered as terrorists and our enemy gain control of a country
as you can see from various articles al nusra control all the bakeries , oil , gas resources and have taken them from the "free syrian army" rebels with impunity
how the UK or USA expect the rebels to be able to dominate and control al nusra is beyond belief.
it's likely going to be a war we end up fighting on terror again and then how many British civilians get kidnapped and murdered around the world? and how many suicide bombings happen to kill westerners? and where is all the money coming from to fund this?
Last edited:
I think now is absolutely the right time to intervene. The objectives must be clearly defined, however; it seems that preventing further atrocities and protecting the civilian population is likely to be the stated aim (how USA/UK choose to achieve that is open to debate, as evidenced in today's newspapers). Using chemical weapons against civilian populations is unacceptable, and the humanitarian situation in the country has been steadily declining. I for one will fully support any military intervention with a view to achieving the stated aims defined above.
Even with no proof it was assads regime who carried out the chemical attacks?
it's all hear say , speculation and more importantly than anything the desire to pin it on assad
and you are crazy if you think removing assad and prolonging a civil war for decades is going to improve anything for the people who live there
it is not just assad vs the rebels like so many people seem to think..
its al nusra controlling the infrastructure that assad has lost and not the rebels and it wont be the rebels who end up in control of the country if assad goes.
Associate
- Joined
- 19 Aug 2012
- Posts
- 202
I don't believe a single word our or the American government spews, they're proven liars with agendas that we will never be told about. Just look at this information that was hacked from a British security contractor Britam Defence barley reported and not a single word about it on BBC.
http://in.news.yahoo.com/us-backed-plan-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-syria-045648224.html
The whole thing is a joke we're even arming Al-Qaeda in Syria after fighting them for 12 years in Afghanistan, let that sink in for a second, we are financing and giving weapons to the Islamist scum we've been letting our soldiers die for in a nonsensical war for 12 bloody years. Can it get any more infuriating than that?
If it were up to me I'd take the leadership groups of our 3 political parties, skin them alive and hang them upside down outside of Westminster and allow passers by to throw salt at them while they slowly die in agony. I'd give anything for 10 minutes alone in a room with William "short man syndrome" hague.
http://in.news.yahoo.com/us-backed-plan-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-syria-045648224.html
The whole thing is a joke we're even arming Al-Qaeda in Syria after fighting them for 12 years in Afghanistan, let that sink in for a second, we are financing and giving weapons to the Islamist scum we've been letting our soldiers die for in a nonsensical war for 12 bloody years. Can it get any more infuriating than that?
If it were up to me I'd take the leadership groups of our 3 political parties, skin them alive and hang them upside down outside of Westminster and allow passers by to throw salt at them while they slowly die in agony. I'd give anything for 10 minutes alone in a room with William "short man syndrome" hague.
1) we dont even know for sure who used the chemical weapons
2) you want to take sides when we still dont even know if the rebels will be better/worse than the current regime ?
3) how will bombing them help the civilians? other than creating more chaos ?
4) we dont have money , jobs being laid off, etc but you think it ok to drop bombs costing us 100,000's a go ?
Let's just nuke the entire area and be done with it.
Only that wouldn't make nearly as much money, would it. And would leave us without a credible "terror risk" to justify all our military spending.
Much better to just stoke the fires, test some shiny new weapons once in a while, and make a fortune selling the slightly older ones.
Hurrah for the West and liberty!
Only that wouldn't make nearly as much money, would it. And would leave us without a credible "terror risk" to justify all our military spending.
Much better to just stoke the fires, test some shiny new weapons once in a while, and make a fortune selling the slightly older ones.
Hurrah for the West and liberty!
Its crazy isn't it, obviously their talking logic/reason because it's in their interest to, but still its funny it's them doing it while the US/UK are warmongering and spouting nonsense/sensationalism
The guns were widely produced long after the war, and in service with countries like East Germany, Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia long into the 80's. It's highly unlikely the ones the rebels found were originals, most likely later reproductions sold to middle east countries (like Syria) after the fall of the USSR or after a member state upgraded to AK's.
Well, it was Cameron who was trying to claim that North Korea was a direct threat to the UK not that long ago (Scottish Independence context) so am I surprised?
Not a little bit.
The British state has learnt nothing. Why? Because it is incapable of change. It will always be a violent nation.
Not a little bit.
The British state has learnt nothing. Why? Because it is incapable of change. It will always be a violent nation.
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2011
- Posts
- 22,392
- Location
- ST4
I have to say, it's nice of Cameron and the rest of the Muppets in power to give the Syrian regime fair-warning and time to move their stockpiles of chemical agents before any missiles are launched.
You can not bomb chemical weapon factories or storage facilities...
There is no proof it was even assad.
read the thread you might learn something you haven't from a couple of headlines
45 minutes?
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2011
- Posts
- 22,392
- Location
- ST4
Soldato
- Joined
- 9 Jun 2005
- Posts
- 4,698
- Location
- Wiltshire
Its like a party round George Galloways house in here. Im just glad people like you are not in power, the world would be even more ******.
So you agree that bombing Syria will bring about peace?
Or perhaps most people here are sick of their country 'intervening' in foreign invasions and wars that inevitably accomplish nothing constructive what so ever?