Poll: Syrian Chemical Weapon Attack

Would you support a military strike on Syria without a UN Security Council resolution?


  • Total voters
    828
  • Poll closed .
Use them in battle?

20111103194030-tm-tfb.jpeg


they have some m1 garands out there too.

Calll in the dogs!
 
Tony Blair's government once considered giving Bashar al-Assad an honorary knighthood. Now he wants the **** bombed out of him.

What a crazy grimy world we live in.

Amusing quote from the Russian Deputy PM earlier, "The West behaves towards the Islamic world like a monkey with a grenade." :)
 
Last edited:
Tony Blair, what a tool... I just wonder will China ever start to challenge America`s interest?? During Cold War they were a lot more active and their power now has grown dramatically yet they insist on not doing anything...

On STG`s, where the hell are they getting the ammo for them from?? As I remember its a weird caliber that was unique to nazi germany, so do they have nazi ammo lol?? Surely in 70 years the gun-powder should have deteriorated.
 
I guess camerons unlikely to be elected again so might as well get his name in the history books

The history of being Congresses lapdog?

Hague was assuredly without words, when trying to explain why he could not "detail" our response before the Presidents one.

If the Public has anything to wonder about, it is how Westminster deals with the White house in the future, its a prime reason for a lot of crap in recent years.
 
The history of being Congresses lapdog?

Hague was assuredly without words, when trying to explain why he could not "detail" our response before the Presidents one.

If the Public has anything to wonder about, it is how Westminster deals with the White house in the future, its a prime reason for a lot of crap in recent years.

What do you mean how we deal with White House??

White House says, Westminster does is that even debatable?
 
I wish that someone would ask the MP's, Presidents and any spokesman what Assad's regime would possibly benefit from this mindless chemical attack when they are in as strong as position they have been for years.

There is no answer.
 
I wish that someone would ask the MP's, Presidents and any spokesman what Assad's regime would possibly benefit from this mindless chemical attack when they are in as strong as position they have been for years.

There is no answer.

Well, i'd like to see what the whitehouse would do if there was a Hispanic uprising and they started shooting up the joint? Not sure there would be peace talks and plans to surrender land to the Hispanics...
 
I wish that someone would ask the MP's, Presidents and any spokesman what Assad's regime would possibly benefit from this mindless chemical attack when they are in as strong as position they have been for years.

There is no answer.

Someone should ask them how the world will possibly benefit from al nursa front taking control of syria and turning it into a militant islamic state

the rebels can not win a war vs them..
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/10/syria-al-nusra-front-jihadi
al nursa are far to organised and if you look at some of the stories even the free syrian army soldiers (rebels) often say the al nursa front fighters are much more organised and much better than they are.

it's just going to end up a terrorist breeding country like afghanistan was.
if the west tries to install a puppet then al nursa front will just carry on with the suicide bombings and fighting like they have been doing for the last 2 years..

and for anyone not keeping upto date the rebels and al nursa only get along when it suits them other times they are killing each other.

Not that I am pro assad it just seems like the lesser of 2 evils and better for the civilians that still live there.

TBH I don't see any of the millions of refugees that fled across the border ever going back anymore
 
Last edited:
"We can't topple Bashar and hand it to the FSA to establish the same apostate secularist state. We are not fighting against Bashar only; we are fighting the system."

The tactics with which al-Nusra is waging its war are no less brutal than those of its al-Qaida-affiliated counterparts in other areas of the Middle East. A few weeks before our visit, after a feud with a local tribe over oil, al-Nusra fighters had surrounded the village of Albu Saray and taken the whole male population of the village prisoner. A few of them were accused of killing an al-Nusra commander, and were executed, and many of the houses in the village were flattened. "Do you know why the Americans and Israelis are winning and we Arabs always lose?" asked the emir. "Because we Arabs are emotional."

Al-Nusra, by contrast, was an international organisation, and was "not built on emotions". Its members should be ready to kill their brothers or cousins if they were proved to have to committed apostasy.

"Hitting Albu Saray was a pre-emptive strike," he said. "They were weak. They had a bad reputation. Kill them, and you teach more powerful tribes a lesson. They will start fearing."
 
Back
Top Bottom