Poll: Syrian Chemical Weapon Attack

Would you support a military strike on Syria without a UN Security Council resolution?


  • Total voters
    828
  • Poll closed .
So you agree that bombing Syria will bring about peace?

Or perhaps most people here are sick of their country 'intervening' in foreign invasions and wars that inevitably accomplish nothing constructive what so ever?

I don't think it will bring peace but its better than doing nothing.

So Iraq and Afghanistan achieved nothing? Thats not true though is it.
 
I don't think it will bring peace but its better than doing nothing.

So Iraq and Afghanistan achieved nothing? Thats not true though is it.

It's just what you want to hear when your house has been burnt down and your country destroyed - that the good guys are coming to bomb what's left!

I'm not actually sure more bombs, destruction and death is actually better than 'doing nothing'.

We have clearly learnt nothing of the Middle East.

Iraq did not achieve anything productive, and Afghanistan might be a bit early to say but from our point of view it's looking like another total waste of life.
 
Its like a party round George Galloways house in here. Im just glad people like you are not in power, the world would be even more ******.

I'm not personally against some kind of intervention to deter the use of chemical weapons on civilians. It is disgusting and it has to be understood that committing these acts has consequences. I just think talk of action and threats need to happen after facts have been established and it turns out to be true.

Unless you're 12 years old you'd be naive to think that the rebels don't see the advantage of US intervention in Syria. The "red line" is well known and there's a lot of chemical weapons in Syria so it's quite sensible for one to suggest that if chemical weapons fell into rebel hands they could quite easily justify denotation of these devices for the greater good.
 
I don't think it will bring peace but its better than doing nothing.

...Bombing a country for no reason is better than doing nothing? Id better add that to the list of things better than Twilight then.


So Iraq and Afghanistan achieved nothing? Thats not true though is it.

Depends what you consider an achievement, if you think getting many British/American soldiers killed for no reason, destabilizing a couple of countries setting them back decades in the process and getting masses of people killed to be an achievement then yes they did achieve something...
 
We still don't have conclusive proof who used the chemical weapons and we are already talking about bombing... Sad
 
We still don't have conclusive proof who used the chemical weapons and we are already talking about bombing... Sad

As I posted before.........

White House spokesman Jay Carney later said that a separate report on chemical weapons use being compiled by the US intelligence community would be published this week.

So why the clamour for inspectors?
 
[TW]Fox;24838852 said:
Is there anything you guys won't find a conspiracy in?!

'being' = present tense

Presumably the reason why not 'now' is because they've not finished it.

I have absolute faith in the Anglo-American intelligence agencies.

I just hope nobody ends up hanging themselves from a tree for it this time.

:mad: :rolleyes: :(
 
[TW]Fox;24838852 said:
Is there anything you guys won't find a conspiracy in?!

'being' = present tense

Presumably the reason why not 'now' is because they've not finished it.

It is perfectly reasonable to ask the question, it doesn't make you a conspiracy theorist.
 
We still don't have conclusive proof who used the chemical weapons and we are already talking about bombing... Sad

As I said my money is on
During the Syrian civil war, the group launched many attacks, mostly against targets affiliated with or supportive of the Syrian government. As of June 2013, al-Nusra Front had claimed responsibility for 57 of the 70 suicide attacks in Syria during the conflict

everyone who barges into the thread pro leaving a power vacuum seems to have no idea the strongest most organised and most wealthy of the people fighting assad are declared a terrorist group by the us/uk
once again for people who skip the thread and jump in
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/10/syria-al-nusra-front-jihadi
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18048033


There are even videos of them killing Free Syrian Army commanders (FSA are the rebels to you and I)

they only fight with the rebels when it suits them every other time they are attacking them as much as they are assad.

you must be crazy if you think the normal rebels will be in control or we are handing the country back to it's civilian population
 
Back
Top Bottom