Considering BAE probably sold them the weapons they are using on their own population. I imagine the government want to hush this up, just like the US sold Israel the means to shoot Palestinian kids
Fairly sure the majority of Syrian arms are sourced from Russia/ex USSR. Apart from that stockpile of German STG44's that were found by the rebels of course.
Considering BAE probably sold them the weapons they are using on their own population. I imagine the government want to hush this up, just like the US sold Israel the means to shoot Palestinian kids
[TW]Fox;24807504 said:If the government doesnt do anything:
OMG CONSPIRACY!!! OMG!!! THEY ARE HUSHING IT UP!!!
If the government does something:
OMG!!! CONSPIRACY!! THEY ARE GETTING INVOLVED!
Is there anything that isn't a conspiracy these days?
If only we could get 90% of the Syrian population to follow the religion of peace...Oh! Wait...
You seem to forget that most Syrians are in favor of Assad regime.
Even if Assad falls, the people of Syria will achieve nothing same as what Libya achieved, country got sent to stone-age and now theres war between streets.. Extremist are trying to get hold of power and normal civilians are now way worse off than under Gedaffi.
US are now concerned that if "rebels" win, it will become a terrorist state since 99% of the rebel army originate from various extremist factions including al-queeda... So we supply our enemies with weapons for free...
Chemical weapons? Yeah sounds real smart to use chemical weapons while you are winning so you can give excuse for NATO to come and bomb you, 100% legit. I bet the Syrian government will find a nuke and bomb some village or something with it... Maybe borrow "tsar bomba" from Russians?? Since it seems the only way out to get those 2-3 rebels out of compound...
Why would Assad do this when he has the upper hand against Al Nusra and the FSA?
I wouldn't agree that the vast majority of Syrians are in favour of the regime, vast majority of Alawites perhaps.
But does he have the upper hand?
According to a CIA report Assad would get 75% of the vote in the 2014 elections,no many British politicians would ever get that.
Yes,the FSA themselves have acknowledged this.
According to a CIA report Assad would get 75% of the vote in the 2014 elections,no many British politicians would ever get that.
There's a more but Google is your friend.
http://hellasfrappe.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/cia-report-admits-that-if-elections-are.html#.UhUKOT_3N4k
http://www.worldtribune.com/2013/05/31/nato-data-assad-winning-the-war-for-syrians-hearts-and-minds/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/31/bashar-al-assad-upper-hand-syria-war_n_3368394.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-23777201
Pretty shocking stuff on the news right now. Apparantly Syria has used chemical weapons to attack Damascus. Reports are that over 650 people have been killed.
How can the other nations of the world just stand back and let this kinda thing go on? No government has the right to massacre its own people.
I can't say I'd give much weight to the first link at all really..
As for the second article, I'm not really sure how you can carry out what is effectively opinion polling accurately in the middle of a civil war. Also telling how none of the "activists and independent organizations" are named in the article.
The third link is over two months old, a lot can change in two months.