Poll: Syrian Chemical Weapon Attack

Would you support a military strike on Syria without a UN Security Council resolution?


  • Total voters
    828
  • Poll closed .
one of the turkish papers ******** links to is zaman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaman_(newspaper)
which seems to be the biggest news paper in turkey

but nevermind all the turkish news papers obviously got it wrong and somehow the story got lost in translation from turkish to turkish and reuters must be right

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/30/us-syria-crisis-turkey-idUSBRE94T0YO20130530

(Adana governor) Cos said unknown chemical materials were found during the raids and sent away for investigation. He denied media reports that a small amount of the nerve agent sarin had been uncovered.

I guess like our media, the Turkish papers can be premature and sensationalist.
 
but nevermind all the turkish news papers obviously got it wrong and somehow the story got lost in translation from turkish to turkish and reuters must be right

Make your mind up, I thought you kept telling us the media lies/makes things up/whatever?

Could it actually be that nobody really knows what's going on and that perhaps it isn't possible to work out exactly whats going on simply using a computer in the UK with access to the internet?
 
There won't BE a war against Assad, there will be limited strikes designed to reduce the regimes capacity for another chemical strike. Most likely the primary target will be the 4th armoured as they are the ones commanded by Assads brother and the ones who are believed to be responsible for the chemical attack.

This is purely going to be a punitive action, not war in the specific sense.

Are these the same type of "limited" strikes that we witnessed in Libya?

"Designed to to reduce the regimes capacity" have you forgotten how deceptively the "limited" mandate was manipulated for 100% regime change including strikes on a fleeing gaddafi that resulted in his brutal execution?

Unfortunately the UK/US have tied their own hands on the international stage because of lies and manipulation only a short time ago, at the detriment of the Syrian people.
 
I've added a poll. I've also got an implicit assumption that the UN weapons inspectors confirm chemical weapons were used but I couldn't fit that in.
 
Wiki suggests the Syrian air forces top fighter is the MiG 29 which although still a very capable fighter, it shouldn't give a Typhoon flown by a highly trained RAF pilot too much trouble.

They still use MiG 25s as interceptors which are very fast but I'd guess them to be a poor fighter and years out of date.
 
Well as you said, they are not going to get an opportunity to engage in air-to-air combat anyway. We'll use cruise missiles launched from submarines, destroyers and possibly aircraft outside of Syrian airspace. It seems extremely unlikely they'll attack us, because that will only further escalate matters.
 
There will never be a UN SC resolution whilst Russia is at the table. Russia could tell Assad to skidaddle and he would, but it seems theyve gone all cold war on this one.
 
Well as you said, they are not going to get an opportunity to engage in air-to-air combat anyway. We'll use cruise missiles launched from submarines, destroyers and possibly aircraft outside of Syrian airspace. It seems extremely unlikely they'll attack us, because that will only further escalate matters.

Right, so Syria isn't daft enough to risk escalating matters but it would launch a chemical attack that risked escalating matters?
 
Well as you said, they are not going to get an opportunity to engage in air-to-air combat anyway. We'll use cruise missiles launched from submarines, destroyers and possibly aircraft outside of Syrian airspace. It seems extremely unlikely they'll attack us, because that will only further escalate matters.

That and they simply don't have the military capability.
 
Back
Top Bottom