Poll: Syrian Chemical Weapon Attack

Would you support a military strike on Syria without a UN Security Council resolution?

  • Total voters
    828
  • Poll closed .
What is Hague doing, definitely some secret agenda going on here.

I would love someone to ask Hague why the hell would Assad do that. In what way would it benefit his regime.
 
None of your business America, time to put more rebels in charge of a country because it worked so well for Libya.
 
Something needs to be done, not much you can do until it's verified however.
But then what, both sides are as bad as each other.

UN should dare and say we are coming In, To verify or discredit the attack. Then get a team on the ground by any means. Upto the, if they want their Sam sites and other infastructure destroying.
 
This gov chemical attack isn't very credible - no motive exists for them to do it, the rebels on the other hand...

Either way I bet good money it turns out to be a crock of **** (after we come in under the guise of chemical weapons) - why would Assad hand the rebels victory on a plate by giving the USA the justification to get involved?
 
Last edited:
elmarko said:
Thia gov chemical attack isn't very credible - no motive exists for them to do it, the rebels on the other hand.....
Click to expand...

On the flip side if it was the rebels why are they not allowing un team in, it would be massive coup for them and massively under mine support for the rebels. Even Russia is pressuring them to allow a un team in. It wouldn't be the first time after, think saddam and the Kurd attack. There was no real reason for it and the international storm it brought on him.

One way or another a un team needs to get in there and investigate to see what happened and if t did, who launched it.
 
Last edited:
No matter what we do, the hand-wringing ******* Guardianistas will be up in arms and whining to the media about it.

If we go in and try to sort it out, then we're accused of interfering in another Islamic nation's internal struggle. Don't go in and let them kick the living snot out of each other and we'll be accused of standing by and allowing genocide. We can't win no matter what we do.
 
The Running Man said:
Do they not have satellite footage of the area? You'd think in this day and age they'd be able to see a lot from the sky even if it is a bit hot for drones etc
Click to expand...
I was thinking about that yesterday. Scientists can determine the atmospheric composition of worlds lights years away but we need to send in ground based inspectors to Syria. Then again I know sod all about what's actually involved or how they go about their work.. :o
 
Glaucus said:
On the flip side if it was the rebels why are they not allowing un team in, it would be massive coup for them and massively under mine support for the rebels. Even Russia is pressuring them to allow a un team in. It wouldn't be the first time after, think saddam and the Kurd attack. There was no real reason for it and the international storm it brought on him.

One way or another a un team needs to get in there and investigate to see what happened and if t did, who launched it.
Click to expand...

did the UN visiting 500 sites in iraq and finding nothing save Saddam? no because America and Britain insisted they had WMD's and ignored the evidence anyway. the blix guy in charge of the UN inspections even said the war was illegal


if america attack I hope russia and china start ******* with american assets around the world

I was thinking about that yesterday. Scientists can determine the atmospheric composition of worlds lights years away but we need to send in ground based inspectors to Syria. Then again I know sod all about what's actually involved or how they go about their work..
Click to expand...
all they would be able to do is confirm an attack happened they can't tell who did it
 
Last edited:
arknor really is voicing some ignoramus crap for the past few days on Syria.
Sorry been lurking the Syria threads and man.......

Best thing I have seen on this whole syria thing so far was this.
It is a bit old and the soldier has now passed on, though truly moved me the bravery of the man.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom