Poll: Syrian Chemical Weapon Attack

Would you support a military strike on Syria without a UN Security Council resolution?

  • Total voters
    828
  • Poll closed .
scorza said:
No he isn't - he pretty much has to take action after he very publicly made the use of CW a red line
Click to expand...

Ah that old self-created right to bomb. "Yeah lets draw the line at chem-weps, then in future we'll get Israel or whatever to use chem-weps, create some fake evidence for Obama's eyes only, create some staged propaganda for the public to support us, and then rightfully take out Syria."

**** you Obama/Cameron you mindless puppets. Just as thick as Blair and the fake evidence presented to him.

:mad:

When's the last time there was a war on poverty? "Ohhhh but Assad has used chem-weps, and I said that's bad! So lets bomb em!"


altus said:
If anyone I loved was killed by another human, I would not care if it was a chemical weapon or a punch that caused it. It only matters to politicians.
Click to expand...

Exactly. It only matters to these corrupt politicians using it as an excuse to fulfil their secret agendas.
 
Last edited:
According to reports in Mint Press News made by veteran Associated Press reporter Dale Gavlak, the chemical attack came from Syrian rebel arms by Prince Bandar, not the Assad regime.

Gavlak writes, “The U.S., Britain, and France as well as the Arab League have accused the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad for carrying out the chemical weapons attack, which mainly targeted civilians. U.S. warships are stationed in the Mediterranean Sea to launch military strikes against Syria in punishment for carrying out a massive chemical weapons attack. The U.S. and others are not interested in examining any contrary evidence, with U.S Secretary of State John Kerry saying Monday that Assad’s guilt was ‘a judgment … already clear to the world.’”

Gavlak’s report states that the U.S. is not interested in differing opinion, despite evidence that points to Saudi Arabian Prince Bandar.
Click to expand...

http://benswann.com/reports-saudi-prince-using-u-s-to-topple-assad-to-consolidate-own-power/

And the truth will set you free.

So there we have it, SA gave the chemical weapons to the rebels, the rebels used them to try and force intervention from the west. Assad in this case is innocent.
 
LateX'Dog said:
http://benswann.com/reports-saudi-prince-using-u-s-to-topple-assad-to-consolidate-own-power/

And the truth will set you free.

So there we have it, SA gave the chemical weapons to the rebels, the rebels used them to try and force intervention from the west. Assad in this case is innocent.
Click to expand...

LoL, because an article by a media person is prove.

According to reports in Mint Press News made by veteran Associated Press reporter Dale Gavlak
Click to expand...
Such a good source, who has access to all information.

And how do you go from
“They didn’t tell us what these arms were or how to use them,” complained a female fighter named ‘K.’ “We didn’t know they were chemical weapons. We never imagined they were chemical weapons.”
Click to expand...

To pictures of multiple shells, and delivered within a short time period over a largish area. Seeing as some of these are saying it was accidental mishandling. Mishandling doesn't leave shells lodged in the ground over a large area in a short time frame.

That doesn't mean that The US is correct. But your facts, is not facts at all. Do you always believe such a short article with no sources or evidence at all. Not even from anyone who would be privy to all the facts and intelligence.
 
Last edited:
Glaucus said:
Do you always believe such a short article with no sources or evidence at all. Not even from anyone who would be privy to all the facts and intelligence.
Click to expand...

Shockingly no. I base my believe from multiple articles from around the web and not from what the BBC spoon feeds me. Unlike the vast majority of armchair generals here.

If you have a quick google around and take a look, you'll soon find all the information you need. But again as the vast majority of the "hipster" OCUK members do, just camp this thread and belittle people to make your lives feel a little more significant.
 
All the information Lol, get real, you are just as spoon fed, you just prefer alternative news.

So how do mishandling unknown weapons, result in a targeted launch.

Hipsters, camping etc. struggling to actually make a decent argument by any chance, so falling back to lame remarks. No surprise there.
 
Last edited:
This thread is a complete joke with people believing random unknown news sites as purveyors of truth and all the established sites as liars - paranoid much?
 
asim18 said:
When's the last time there was a war on poverty? "Ohhhh but Assad has used chem-weps, and I said that's bad! So lets bomb em!"
Click to expand...

Very good point Asim. All the keyboard warriors calling for war and destruction and and saying anyone who doesn't agree with the NWO/Israel/Bankers latest crusade has blood on there hands because people are dying out there from chemical weapons even though it's highly likely Assad never used them.

Everyday across the planet several thousand people stave to death, where's the calls for immediate action to be taken about that? Why are the war advocates so silent about that?
 
Johnnytoxic said:
Just carry on believing everything you read in the mainstream news.
Click to expand...

The flip side of that though is that, in this thread alone, those using "alternative news" sites have said it was the rebels, a US false flag attack, no attack at all and, an old favourite, the Jews that did it. Oh and the bankers, but that was magick so doesn't really count.
 
RDM said:
The flip side of that though is that, in this thread alone, those using "alternative news" sites have said it was the rebels, a US false flag attack, no attack at all and, an old favourite, the Jews that did it. Oh and the bankers, but that was magick so doesn't really count.
Click to expand...

Its good to hear all sides, and then you can have a balanced opinion.
 
Johnnytoxic said:
Its good to hear all sides, and then you can have a balanced opinion.
Click to expand...

That would depend on how informed the opinion was and how much weight you give to each source. Listening to every nut job with an opinion doesn't really help you come to a informed position. Are all of the previously mentioned positions of equal merit? Are they all supported by evidence?
 
RDM said:
The flip side of that though is that, in this thread alone, those using "alternative news" sites have said it was the rebels, a US false flag attack, no attack at all and, an old favourite, the Jews that did it. Oh and the bankers, but that was magick so doesn't really count.
Click to expand...



Below : Taken from Haaretz (Main english website of Jewish News)

Former Bush administration official: Israel may be behind use of chemical arms in Syria
Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell, says Israel may have conducted 'false flag' operation. Describes its government as inept and Netanyahu as 'clueless.'

http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/west-o...se-of-chemical-arms-in-syria.premium-1.519172
Click to expand...
 
magick said:
Below : Taken from Haaretz (Main english website of Jewish News)
Click to expand...

That story isn't even on their front page.

Also how many retired US army / govt types have confirmed / claimed all sorts of ridiculous things - Roswell* anyone? :D:D:D

*although there's probably still a lot of people on here that still believe that :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom