Quite an interesting video if blockades come into it...The may have enough to blockcade Taiwan though. People are saying they can’t invade because of amphibious capability, well who said they need to invade.
Quite an interesting video if blockades come into it...The may have enough to blockcade Taiwan though. People are saying they can’t invade because of amphibious capability, well who said they need to invade.
Maybe or maybe they are being underestimated.They have capability to invade although it wouldn't be wise because most of their landing craft are civilian roro boats
"China's navy battle force has more than tripled in size in only two decades," read a December report by the leaders of the US Navy, Marines and Coast Guard.
"Already commanding the world's largest naval force, the People's Republic of China is building modern surface combatants, submarines, aircraft carriers, fighter jets, amphibious assault ships, ballistic nuclear missile submarines, large coast guard cutters, and polar icebreakers at alarming speed."
Some of those will be the equal or better of anything the US or other naval powers can put in the water.
"The PLAN is not receiving junk from China's shipbuilding industry but rather increasingly sophisticated, capable vessels," Andrew Erickson, a professor at the US Naval War College's China Maritime Studies Institute, wrote in a February paper.
Semiconductor and other chip manufacturing.Don’t both China mainland and China Taipei see themselves as China? Unresolved civil war?
Why do we care? Genuine Q. Apart from a hang over for backing the looser Chiang chai-shek who was no glorious democrat himself.
Is it just communist bad, or is there some other reason the united China is a bad thing?
Split between uk and USA policies.
But it would be Chinese cement, so would crumble to dust within months.this could be the out that Xi needs to distract the populous and cement his position as leader.
Surprised your not giving us the air situation updates @Rroff apparently its quite busy from what im seeing.
Thats how it all started in the Russia thread those were the days!
Maybe or maybe they are being underestimated.
Technically speaking it's more than on par. I.E China have TWO Kuznetsov class aircraft carriers, Russia only have the one ^^They may have the numbers, but the PLAN is on par with the Russian Navy. It just looks shinier because the ships are new.
Even if they didn't blow it up we wouldn't be able to keep using them if they were under Chinese control as they'd just steal the technology.I hope if China ever fully threatens to take it, that Taiwan blows the fabs up and moves operations elsewhere. Better than putting control into the hands of China.
Technically speaking it's more than on par. I.E China have TWO Kuznetsov class aircraft carriers, Russia only have the one ^^
It is kind of comical that Russia recently had to purpose build an entire dock in order to give their failing ship it's first maintenance/service in 30+ years because they were too stubborn/embarrassed to ask China to do it for them xD (well, they could have asked Ukraine to do it for them too, but I doubt it would have gone down well ).
No, they don't even have that.Russian only have a single carrier of the class of carrier they build?
Rolleyes. Pandering to China. **** Sake.