Tate Brothers - Round 2

Chuk_Chuk said:
Fair point. Though my first instinct is if you have evidence that he is guilty, I don't see how not being able to interview him would matter to the police. Unless the evidence isn't as black and white as people have been making it out to be.
Click to expand...

Sometimes they can uncover other offences by interviewing the suspect which they may not know about.

Make no mistake - being interviewed is not to help the suspect, it's to help the police hence why the correct thing is "no comment". An exception would be providing an iron clad alibi that you were somewhere else so you couldn't have committed the offence, everything else is "no comment" IMHO
 
Last edited:
Richie said:
Sometimes they can uncover other offences by interviewing the suspect which they may not know about.

Make no mistake - being interviewed is not to help the suspect, it's to help the police hence why the correct thing is "no comment". An exception would be providing an iron clad alibi that you were somewhere else so you couldn't have committed the offence, everything else is "no comment" IMHO
Click to expand...

The reason you say no comment is so you dont have to back track when they bring forward evidence that shows you are lying.

If you are guilty the best thing to do is to say no comment until after they have revealed all their evidence.

Once you have been charged they then have to release the evidence they have on you. You then have the chance to work out answers as to why that evidence is not proof of guilt.
 
Richie said:
exception would be providing an iron clad alibi that you were somewhere else so you couldn't have committed the offence, everything else is "no comment" IMHO
Click to expand...

I wouldn't even do that.


Long story but my 14yo nephew got involved with one of the county lines gangs and basically kidnapped and forced to help in a burglary. Despite me telling them do not say a word to police once they found him they let him admit where he was and what they did because they treated him like a victim and lured them into thinking they were on there side. Out of a 14 yo being kidnapped for 4 days the only person that faced charges was the 14 yo. Don't ever talk to the police they are not on your side.
 
mattx4 said:
I wouldn't even do that.


Long story but my 14yo nephew got involved with one of the county lines gangs and basically kidnapped and forced to help in a burglary. Despite me telling them do not say a word to police once they found him they let him admit where he was and what they did because they treated him like a victim and lured them into thinking they were on there side. Out of a 14 yo being kidnapped for 4 days the only person that faced charges was the 14 yo. Don't ever talk to the police they are not on your side.
Click to expand...
The system doesn't care about the truth. It's just what they can prove.

I've heard most convictions are clinched by the information gained at interview.
 
Tony Edwards said:
The reason you say no comment is so you dont have to back track when they bring forward evidence that shows you are lying.

If you are guilty the best thing to do is to say no comment until after they have revealed all their evidence.

Once you have been charged they then have to release the evidence they have on you. You then have the chance to work out answers as to why that evidence is not proof of guilt.
Click to expand...
You never talk to the Police, innocent or not, it can only ever harm your defence if you do.
 
CaptainRAVE said:
Just watched the video of him chatting about how he’s desensitised to violence and would mess up a terrorist if he came across one. What a ****.
Click to expand...

You can kill a terrorist and get away with it.

15minuntes of fame you can milk for £££, its a no brainer.

Not really applicable to Tate though, i mean, the police can just walk up and arrest him, try arresting me when my net-worth is north of a hundred million.
 
Last edited:
How has this non story become a story. Other than here and a couple of random article headlines, I have absolutely no idea who this guy is or why he would be considered even remotely interesting. It’s a weird World we live in.
 
Doobedoo said:
I have absolutely no idea who this guy is or why he would be considered even remotely interesting.
Click to expand...

because he appeals to knuckle draggers and young boys who follow his every word and some will pay £50 a month to hear it.
My 13 year old nephew had a lesson at school warning against Andrew Tate's ideas and I know other schools have dished them out.
 
SexyGreyFox said:
because he appeals to knuckle draggers and young boys who follow his every word and some will pay £50 a month to hear it.
My 13 year old nephew had a lesson at school warning against Andrew Tate's ideas and I know other schools have dished them out.
Click to expand...

I'd try and get him in a decent school where the teachers don't elevate themselves above their neutral remit, assuming they aren't on another strike again.
 
Doobedoo said:
But if you’re talking about him then you’re also promoting him. He’ll disappear when people stop talking about him and stop giving him the airtime he needs.
Click to expand...

So if adults don't talk about him then all these young lads won't be following his ideas :)
I'm pretty sure the World doesn't work that way.

Never mention the word war and it will go away :)
 
Last edited:
SexyGreyFox said:
So if adults don't talk about him then all these young lads won't be following his ideas :)
I'm pretty sure the World doesn't work that way.

Never mention the word war and it will go away :)
Click to expand...
Well these kids know about him because people have been talking about him. It’s become cool because he is considered ‘dangerous’ you know the whole if tell you not to push that button you’re going to push that button type thing.

He’ll just disappear when others decide he’s not that interesting as all the others before him have and those that come after him will too. Any publicity is good publicity as they say.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom