Terrible Jaguar re-brand

Back to the rebranding, I suppose Jag have got to move with the times and an update of the brand was probably due, but I'm sure they could have come up with something better than that.
I also bet it wasn't cheap either.
The old image was instantly recognizable, but this is just neutral.
 
Jag retail sales:-

2019 180,198
2020 140,593
2021 97,669
2022 77,381

so, no I don't things went quickly downhill after their ad campaign in 2022, the rot had clearly already set in by then.
Sales of the F-Pace and F-Type both peaked back in 2018 and had dropped by over 60% by 2023.

To be clear, I don't have an opinion about the advert (that this thread is about) and I'm not triggered by it's wokeness (there's more important things in life to care about). Equally what I think about the ad is also irrelevant as I've never considered buying a Jag.
My only point is that Jag simply doing nothing or just doing the same as before was only going to lead to extinction and I think I'd rather see a pink, sleek and expensive Jag than more of their "SUV" type cars or even no Jag at all.
I agree with the rot being evident for some time, but their change of marketing in (March 2021 so it seems to have started) certainly did nothing for them at all, and that is my point, their marketing went from bad to worse, they were chasing a different market from 2021 onwards.

So all my point is that simply what faith does anyone have they are not just pivoting in another wrong direction yet again? I am on board with them reinventing themselves, but this seems just another mis-step entirely, fashion brands aren't formulaic, so wheeling out every cliché in the book just looks like a poor attempt at a pastiche of a fashion brand and ignoring any knee jerk people may have over woke ideologies which I have also do not let get in the way I'm actually a fan of the potential design language of the new cars so I'm more positive than most and onboard with them targeting a new audience.
 
Last edited:
Back to the rebranding, I suppose Jag have got to move with the times and an update of the brand was probably due, but I'm sure they could have come up with something better than that.
I also bet it wasn't cheap either.
The old image was instantly recognizable, but this is just neutral.
imagine the board meeting saying "yes this looks like a great idea". Its like when everyone dyes their hair to be unique, if everybody does it its not unique anymore. It looks like a generic fashion/Jewellery brand to me looking at the logos
 
TATA owns JLR and this shows a prevailing company culture. Nothing says premium more than showing you have a customer centric business model.

So yes, this is very much a JLR thing as it is a TATA thing.

I have an I-Pace, great car but terrible customer support. I will never consider owning another one
 
TATA owns JLR and this shows a prevailing company culture. Nothing says premium more than showing you have a customer centric business model.

So yes, this is very much a JLR thing as it is a TATA thing.

I have an I-Pace, great car but terrible customer support. I will never consider owning another one
Not sure, he didn't raise any safety concerns with JLR products in his short stint there.. It's a different design team/country/culture at Gaydon, surely?
 
I'm sure Jonny can confirm and maybe I'm wrong here but Tata will have financial and strategic oversight over JLR but they'll operate the brands completely independently. It's still a misleading headline. Jaguar's poor customer service is a brand issue, not the conglomerates.
 
yes interesting bbc article .. so tata technologies have uk based consuitancy to 'help' in car design https://www.tatatechnologies.com/en...ury-experience-at-optimal-costs-thats-better/
are they involved with upcoming jaguar engineering too
- with todays discussion on potential nissan / honda hook-up everybody needs somebody.

[ hadn't seen mercedes eq XX prototype till last week - that was 2 years ago, Jaguar should have been there with a similar halo design concept - I guess the budgets available are an order of magnitude different. ]
 
The point is TATA are alleged to have had JLR sack someone who raised concerns about one of their clients cars. It’s not that there are issues with JLR cars, but the culture of actively covering up poor business practices.

The optics aren’t good.
 
Last edited:
the article is interesting because it shows what tata's other business arms are .. who hadn't thought did they already make cars before jlr purchase and how might they help
(even though this consultancy work was for another manufacturer)
 
Pretty clear consultancy work for an OEM shouldn't be shared publicly on Reddit... The tea leaf reading is as impressive as ever though.

Not sure this says much about the way a company operates. its the same as leaking confidential information, he likely was under a ITK or NDA too.
 
Last edited:
They sacked the guy for whistle blowing. If they were doing something illegal it won't matter if there was an NDA.
 
Last edited:
What is the employer listening to ? Do you know how consultancies work ? He’s sharing work stuff externally.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom