*** The 2011 Gym Rats Thread ***

Status
Not open for further replies.
Any tips for keeping the cost down on chicken breasts? I need about 2.5KG a week. Currently costing me £15 from the supermarket.

The only thing I've found is http://www.westingourmet.co.uk/chicken-breast-fillets.html which works out pretty decent for 5KG but once you add in £7.50 delivery it's not great.

Buy whole chickens?

Used to get two for £6 from Morrisons. So that'd save you about £3 if you brought 4 and probably supply you with more meat tbh. If you went just before closing and stocked up you could get them super cheap. Have been in Asda before when they've let them go for 50p each! :eek:
 
DOMS getting you down? Making it hard to scale those pesky stairs during the day?

Well then I have the solution for you. Try an amazing bowl of Little Al's Big Ass Chilli today! Just have it straight before bed! Made from only the finnest tesco value minced beef, red kidney beans, tomatoes, onions, garlic, chillies and spices.

Its amazing proteins, low Gi carbs and amazing amino mixture will make certain to prevent all manner of DOMS. Especially those painfull legs DOMS after a heavy set of Squats.


So try Little Al's Big Ass Chilli today! No need to spend money on expensive Casein Proteins and Whey blends, stuffed full of sugar and rubbish!


So remember! Little Al's Big Ass Chilli!

For all your DOM destroying needs.

* Warning cooking times and recipe not included. Painful/burning arse may be experienced if too many chillies are used. Little Al takes no responsibility for your weak stomach or intestines during and after the eating of Little Al's Big Ass Chilli.*

* Enjoy responsibly *
 
lol!
I guess the intention is to make you fly up the stairs, even if its to the toilet rather than the bed :D
 
I might have to buy a couple of whole chickens, didn't realise about that

I'm getting through so much :( Eating 700g a day :(
 
"Lower faggot"

Meh, won't stop me. Interesting certainly, but any exercise out there I'm sure there's some sort of study to prove why it's not actually as good as another study shows
 
Yeah I'm struggling to find that, it was a link from a link type of thing. Tried googling and going back to the recent articles that I have read, but can't find it anywhere.

If i can't find it on google then chances are it's nothing with any decent base value tbh :(
 
I don't bother with squatting anymore. I found that if I tried to go heavy my legs were fine but my back wasn't up to it. It's surprising really how much people can leg press compared to squat.
 
I don't bother with squatting anymore. I found that if I tried to go heavy my legs were fine but my back wasn't up to it. It's surprising really how much people can leg press compared to squat.

It's unsuprising. The weak link in deadlifts/squats is ofc the trunk/core. I'm sure most already trained gym goers could comfortably stack most leg presses, or push upwards of 300KG plus on a sled. Though arguably is this functional? The same weight on your back would result in a failed attempt/rep.

It's an interesting article though it's assuming that maximal load is the best way to train a muscle, in most instances it is. Though if this was the case then freeweights are obsolete surely? As most of us can stack or lift more on machines that we ever could free weight. The mechanics of a freeweight lift or a machine lift through the same range of motion are different due to the difference in muscular skelature recruitment, the mechanics of the machine itself and certain muscles not even being recruited at all.

Big can of worms, but an interesting one none the less.
 
Last edited:
Though if this was the case then freeweights are obsolete surely? As most of us can stack or lift more on machines that we ever could free weight. The mechanics of a freeweight lift or a machine lift through the same range of motion are different due to the difference in muscular skelature recruitment, the mechanics of the machine itself and certain muscles not even being recruited at all.

Big can of worms, but an interesting one none the less.


Exactly. Kinda ties in with that other article I have mentioned doesn't it.
I cannot ever see free weights becoming obsolete, as there is no way there would be a machine for every muscle to be worked in isolation.
Also we all know that we work best when we work together, muscles are no different. Ok the total weight lifted might be less than a sled or press, but the squat teaches all your muscles to work together to overcome the task at hand.
Functionally, the squat wins as we would all agree (in the comparison of squat v leg press/sled).
 
no gym for me tonight - although 6 sessions last week means i'm not feeling too guilty ...

had a good session yesterday - nothing too strenuous - also took the kids out to the park etc

woke up this morning with completely "locked" lower back - can hardly straighten it - can walk around - but runing/jogging is a no-no

no idea if gym - carrying kids around park - or I slept funny last night
 
I corrected somebody's form on bench today who was very grateful which is always nice :)

I also stopped a woman doing kickbacks and told her to do some dips and then showed her how to do kickbacks properly *shudder* should she persist. Should have left her to it as black spandex is very revealing when bent over \o/ :p :cool:


If only! Imagine all the IFBB pro's abusing alcohol off their ****(boobs) in all their videos! lol
 
Last edited:
Regarding squats...

First of all, interesting "suggested" video next to the "Death of Squating" video... (relevant bit is somewhere in the middle)


with Eric Cressey, who is awesome.

But I have a few thoughts myself.

Firstly, the leg press.

Lets assume that a good sled plate loaded leg press provides the best loading. It is often wondered why one can move more weight on such machines than when squatting, but a simple exmplanation is missed. Simple mechanics tells us that the load felt by the legs will actually be weight*sin(angle with floor), which can be significantly less (e.g. a 45 degree angle will reduce the weight by 15%). Then there are the standard issues with the specific mechanics of the machine, also including the way the seat is arranged which influences the depth of the movement.

Another factor undoubtedly is the increased neuromuscular complexity of the squat. It requires far more skill to control the muscles in the squat than with leg pressing equivilants. Problems with flexibility are also reduced because the body is kept fixed in place when leg pressing, and this is often a very big factor.

As to whether you should or shouldn't squat, it comes down to what you want to achieve. Sure there are ways to load the muscles of the leg that remove the lower back and other supportive muscles/ligaments/tendons from the equation, but if actual strength is of any concern then you should squat.

The exact reason for squats being harder is the reason to do them, you are training complex supportive structures of the body including the mechanism for hip drive. I think purely for the sake of hypertrophy there might be merit in doing leg pressing with quad/hamstring isolation, but you still won't be fully stimulating the other muscles.
 
I corrected somebody's form on bench today who was very grateful which is always nice :)

I also stopped a woman doing kickbacks and told her to do some dips and then showed her how to do kickbacks properly *shudder* should she persist. Should have left her to it as black spandex is very revealing when bent over \o/ :p :cool:

How did you approach them out of interest? I see many guys.. and girls in the gym (who have been going solidly for a few months now) with shoddy form on things like bench press (wrists bent back) and deadlifts/rows (hunchback of notre dame) but never feel its my place to approach and say 'hey... sorry... can i offer you a tip?'
 
4 days off from the gym and im feeling it, so ready to go back but at home for another day or so. Will destroy chest ( within my limits ) when back wednesday
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom