It would do my nut in if on desktop refresh rate was going down to 40Hz. I can notice difference between fixed 60Hz and 90Hz difference in mouse/window movement on screen, after 90Hz I'd say it gets difficult to perceive a difference for me.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
It wouldn't if it was literally a static screen.It would do my nut in if on desktop refresh rate was going down to 40Hz.
Will upgrading to Windows 10 build 1709 necessitate upgrading GPU drivers? I really don't want to move on from 17.4.4.
For anyone interested, Crimson 17.4.4 works fine with Windows 10 1709.Will upgrading to Windows 10 build 1709 necessitate upgrading GPU drivers? I really don't want to move on from 17.4.4.
@AMDMatt
Just asked this on the AMD forums and I just wondering do you have any more info on this
Not really tired much Chil feature until tonight and I after say it works bloody excellent! Although I dont like settings the Min FPS too Low because you can see the speed up in FPS for slip second.. Min 60fps I find is the sweet spot!
My question though I see AMD say that games will be more responsive and trying out Resi 7 I do think I can notice this lower latency! So is there any benefit in just setting the Min FPS 144 and max 144 my monitor's max Refresh Rate?
Thanks
problem ive found with chill is, you cant just enable it globally and alter the fps mins and maxs, when you have 100+ game profiles in radeon settings, it causes massive slowdown 3+ seconds to open a profile for instance, so removing the profiles and using the global profile would be ideal.I think it's something to do with the GPU activity being low, so it can respond quicker and thus, reduce frame time delivery to display latency.
I'm not sure about your question, sorry. Best to test it and see.
I think it's something to do with the GPU activity being low, so it can respond quicker and thus, reduce frame time delivery to display latency.
I'm not sure about your question, sorry. Best to test it and see.
I just use FRTC. Chill annoys me as there is always a small but noticeable delay as it ramps up to full speed.
Are you sure it's not actually just using FreeSync on the desktop? Theoretically that'd be a good thing because if you're looking at a static image there's no point it wasting power refreshing at 144 Hz. I have no idea if FreeSync can even work outside of fullscreen applications though because surely applications and Windows GUI frameworks rely on a fixed refresh rate.
If it is just stuck at 40 Hz though then that's clearly a bug.
Which driver you on ? I can't currently see it in the latest, Maybe a Frontier Edition feature ?
Radeon Software Crimson ReLive Edition Beta for Windows® 10 Fall Creators Update
https://support.amd.com/en-us/kb-ar...ws-10-Fall-Creators-Update-Release-Notes.aspx