What I typed or how you read it?
What you typed. It makes AMD look stupid. You saying they are that stupid?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
What I typed or how you read it?
Try harderWhat you typed. It makes AMD look stupid. You saying they are that stupid?
Try harder
And no way in hell do they need anywhere near 3x8pin connectors!! Just marketing bs as per.Those coolers don't look cheap.
And no way in hell do they need anywhere near 3x8pin connectors!! Just marketing bs as per.
Yes but an 8pin provides 150W and the slot itself upto 75W.Rumour said as much as 330W for custom models:
Yes but an 8pin provides 150W and the slot itself upto 75W.
Yup, this chip was originally touted as a 220W part!Look at the size of the coolers too. This is going to be clocked within an inch of it's life. Reminds me of the R9 290X.
I'll try explain, AMD committed to doing CES ,they don't have a strong line up, pricing is important for the 2 GPUs, they are also looking suspiciously like they are not ready for launch on the next 6 months. Setting the price wrong or too early has consequences.They had 2 choices and they chose chaos.No need.
Yup, this chip was originally touted as a 220W part!
The 7900XTX used chiplets and a 384 bit memory controller,which didn't help with power consumption. I hope the aftermarket RX9070XT doesn't consume as much as a stock RX7900XTX!!
Thought it was just CDMA(instinct) cards that was doing chiplets?
We know we know where gamers buy products. It's well below that $1000 price point, and we're aiming for a card that delivers outstanding performance where most gamers are buying their cards today. That's not at $1000+, it’s well below that.
Frank Azor
What I would add is, on top of everything that David's shared - think about the quantity of stuff that we brought to the announcement today. If we did talk about RDNA4, we would have had five minutes to do it. If you look at what we did with RDNA3, RDNA2 - we did dedicated events [and keynotes] that took 30, 40, 50 minutes. Because graphics is hard, honestly.
You have to go into the architecture, you have got to go into FSR, explain the differences, then go into what can we do with the machine learning. It didn't fit into this run and this show. But we want to give it a proper stage. You're not going to have to wait very long, but we're going to give it a proper stage.
The RX7900 and RX7800 series use chiplets. A central GCD and multiple MCDs.
Yeah. The other thing I'd tell you is we learned a lot in RDNA 3. A lot. There were times where we were fairly criticized and then we were fairly praised. What we're trying to do is replicate the praise situations. We think we know how to do that around focusing on value, [such as] pricing the product correctly out of the gate. We have several cards that were home runs. You guys told us you liked 7800XT. You liked the 7900 GRE. We'll stop there