Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 30,288
- Location
- Dormanstown.
£200 less than a 5070ti might tempt people tho.
Some people sure.
But replacing items that already exist for similar performance for similar price isn't a seller
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
£200 less than a 5070ti might tempt people tho.
Depends on how its competitor performs, i can't see how the 5070 would perform better than a 7900 XT so if the 9070 XT replaces that for £550 to £599 i suspect it would be tempting to a good few people, it would for me.That's DOA
The guy has the RX 9070 XT Red Devil Limited Edition in front of him, isnt he talking about that card as we all know how much of a premium they go for.
Anyway if the 9070's are more than $550 then I'll just grab a 5070, still at 1080p but running 4 displays, I dont need anything more than a 5070 to be honest.
Depends on how its competitor performs, i can't see how the 5070 would perform better than a 7900 XT so if the 9070 XT replaces that for £550 to £599 i suspect it would be tempting to a good few people, it would for me.
That's DOA
Machine Learning FSR4 and (supposidly) vastly improved RT performance. That's two new things, surely?There's seemingly nothing new with this release to anything that's come before it.
But AMD have already offered products with slightly better price/performance and it's done nothing for them
There's seemingly nothing new with this release to anything that's come before it.
Except maybe in this case AMD actually pulled their launch because of how concerned they were about how they were pricing them lol
No they haven’t, they've been doing what Nvidia have been doing for ten years or more. They asked people to pay more for more performance only to realise that copying their competitors strategy of asking for 20% more money for 20% more performance leave customers with little choice.But AMD have already offered products with slightly better price/performance and it's done nothing for them
Nvidia already there though.Machine Learning FSR4 and (supposidly) vastly improved RT performance. That's two new things, surely?
It is worth factoring in much improved RT and better FSR. So at £600 with 10% more raster and 50% better RT than a 7900 XT, it would render the 7900 XT pointless at the same price.
I’m not saying £600 is great, just acceptable if it is 5070Ti level performance for £150 less.
I see your point but I only play DayZ which never sees over 6GB VRAM usage so 12GB should be good.Even at 1080P, it may not be worth be buying a brand new GPU that has less than 16GB.
But the 7900XT wasn't doing anything to turn the tide with what it's offered for 2 years lol.
And I built machines with 7900XT/7900XTX's for friends.
£500-£550 is my budget so I'd get the 9070xt over the 5070 and 5070ti, I'm coming from 3080
Not at it’s original MSRP no, but had it released at £650 it would have been far better received.
Machine Learning FSR4 and (supposidly) vastly improved RT performance. That's two new things, surely?
I mean FSR and RT aren't new, they've been in previous generations.It is worth factoring in much improved RT and better FSR. So at £600 with 10% more raster and 50% better RT than a 7900 XT, it would render the 7900 XT pointless at the same price.
I’m not saying £600 is great, just acceptable if it is 5070Ti level performance for £150 less.
I've got no skin in the game but looking at a 7900XT review, I wouldn't be impressed in that type of upgrade if the 9070XT is indeed that type of performance unless it was like super cheap.
I've got no skin in the game but looking at a 7900XT review, I wouldn't be impressed in that type of upgrade if the 9070XT is indeed that type of performance unless it was like super cheap.