• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** The AMD RDNA 4 Rumour Mill ***

I honestly don't know what is wrong with AMD right now, by the leaks you have an amazing product and Nvidia cant match unless they drop price of 5080 and everyone is unhappy with Nvidia's antics, low performance gain, more money, melting power connectors, fake frames, paper launch with practically no stock what more do you need AMD?

Everything considered up to this point, you would expect AMD are gearing up for a pretty revolutionary launch where they are actually going to take this by the horns. It's what makes this particular launch so exciting since AMD really do have a good opportunity but they also have a severe reputation for fumbling - what's it going to be?

So it has to match a £1000 gfx card in performance but cost £250 less.
Nvidia's marketing is something else I'll give them that

Blame AMD for setting the scene. They specifically said they are going to price 'aggressively' and 'go for market share'.

If AMD want to disrupt if the performance leaks are true, drop the 9070XT @ £549 and the 9070 @ £479.

They would literally not be able to manufacture them fast enough.

£650 was my limit to begin with, then with leaks I would have stretched to around 700, but if I now have to buy a new PSU aswell?... :(
 
Last edited:
I suppose its to be expected overall, AMD have played the performance per watt card well on the last few gens....

Sad times on the PSU front for me too, but tbh I shouldn't moan as my BeQuiet 600w has been an absolute trooper and its rolling with an x3d chip and 7800xt no problems. shouldnt push my luck :P

Shame i will have to pay SFX tax for any new one though
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately, all the leaks so far just say DP 2.1. But I'm sure on the announcement on 28th, they'll detail this. Last time with the 7000 series announcement, AMD were rubbing it in Nvidia's face that they supported DP2.1 while Nvidia was only still using DP 1.4a for 4000 series. So I'd be surprised if this time AMD let Nvidia get ahead being the only GPUs with UHBR20 support, when AMD was also the first with UHBR20 on some of their professional workstation GPUs.
Yep, hoping it will be the case for the new AMD cards. Trying to future proof myself as much as possible, particularly as planning a new OLED monitor purchase within the next 12 months.
 
Blame AMD for setting the scene. They specifically said they are going to price 'aggressively' and 'go for market share'.

Show me where an AMD rep stated this. As far as I've seen so far nobody from amd has talked about pricing besides debunking the alleged 899 price tag and saying they are listening to comments on pricing. And they've said next to bugger all about marketshare either.

 
It has surely just got to be in their interests to do their best on the pricing. If they create a greatt mid range solution and it's priced aggressively that is going to hurt NV and their market share far more. The keeping up with the jones' route just won't work as the RTX 4/5 gen cards at the top tier are just insane

The 5700xt was great example of this as it was undeniably slower than the top end RTX 2080 series but at its price point it was a hell of a mid range slugger in the marketplace
 
Last edited:
Wow top edition needs powaaarrr


Sorry if it's a repost, far to many postings to catch up on in here
 
Show me where an AMD rep stated this.
So, my number one priority right now is to build scale, to get us to 40 to 50 percent of the market faster. Do I want to go after 10% of the TAM [Total Addressable Market] or 80%? I’m an 80% kind of guy because I don’t want AMD to be the company that only people who can afford Porsches and Ferraris can buy. We want to build gaming systems for millions of users.
According to ITHome, AMD is preparing to disrupt its competition with aggressive pricing for its upcoming RX 9000 series. The RX 9070 XT, built on the RDNA 4 architecture, is expected to launch at $599, positioning it directly against NVIDIA's RTX 5070 Ti, which carries a $749 price tag.
 
Wow top edition needs powaaarrr


Sorry if it's a repost, far to many postings to catch up on in here

Ooosh!

Beautiful card though!!
 
Wow top edition needs powaaarrr


Sorry if it's a repost, far to many postings to catch up on in here
Was just having a read. Seems quite reasonable. 750w - 1000w PSU should see most people through.
 



So they've mentioned marketshare, but as usual the "aggressive pricing" thing is some rumour from a website. So yet again on this forum some random rumour somehow becomes "amd said" a few pages down the line....
 
Show me where an AMD rep stated this. As far as I've seen so far nobody from amd has talked about pricing besides debunking the alleged 899 price tag and saying they are listening to comments on pricing. And they've said next to bugger all about marketshare either.


Pretty much tells me want market share how do you do that ? Price aggressively

 
Pretty much tells me want market share how do you do that ? Price aggressively


Amd have not said anything yet about aggressive pricing, the post above stated that amd "specifically said" they would price aggressively, when in reality they've said nothing like that.
 
If 9070xt is so efficient why did amd not make a 5080 killer

Big missed opportunity; unless the 9070xt is expensive to make for amd, that's probably the issue I guess, its not that AMD can't compete with Nvidia at the high end, it's that AMD's architecture makes high end too expensive to manufacture

I think AMD were expecting Nvidia to knock something bigger out the park, the 4090 shocked AMD, they were not expecting it to be as powerful as it was.. this time they expected an even bigger jump in performance but this time across the range, so AMD thought that what they were doing with rDNA 4 couldn't compete after the issues they had with rdna3. So why bother wasting money and resources making high end chips that couldn't compete? So they chose to stick to the mid range.

An alternative thought though is that the 9070xt chip was originally scheduled to be an 80 series chip but they believed it wasn't powerful enough to compete with Nvidia next gen so they dropped it down a tier, and now have been caught on the hop that they actually could have released it as an 80 series card..
 
Amd have not said anything yet about aggressive pricing, the post above stated that amd "specifically said" they would price aggressively, when in reality they've said nothing like that.

I think it's normal to presume pricing, if they officially said they want market share how else are they getting it ?
 
Back
Top Bottom