*** The AMD RDNA 4 Rumour Mill ***

[muon]

Its massive hopium to go that far. Fair play if its gets anywhere near it.

If you read the article it is only 4-8% slower than the 4090, but also only 14% faster than the 6800 XT.

The 6800 XT must be a a beast. Should buy that.

 

[CAT-THE-FIFTH]

affordable 4k gaming cards inc

Nvidias 5000 series not gonna be in stores for months

time to go amd radeon

AMD Marketing:

 

[Sythe79]

If they are popular and that good, I think people who already have an AMD card should get a 20% discount and the turncoats with Nvidia cards pay the 50% more they don't seem to mind paying, seems only fair.

 

[muon]

If they are popular and that good, I think people who already have an AMD card should get a 20% discount and the turncoats with Nvidia cards pay the 50% more they don't seem to mind paying, seems only fair.

Just buy second hand 6800 XT cards. They are dirt cheap.

4070 Ti - 161fps
6800 XT - 186fps
9070 XT - 212fps
4090 - 221 fps

This all sounds legit.

 

[Nitefly]

So summing up the rumours it comes with:

- 32 GB
- 4090 performance inc. ray tracing
- as good as DLSS transformer upscaling
- £700 launch price
- oh and the ability to freeze hell over too

 

[Besty]

no but it looks like it will pack a beyond-7900XTX level of punch with FSR4 enabled.

whether you'll be able to tell the difference between a 9070XT, 5070ti and 5080 in a 1440p blind test is going to be interesting.

If the last few days of news if there's any card that's DOA it actually looks like the £1350 5080.

 

[muon]

no but it looks like it will pack a beyond-7900XTX level of punch with FSR4 enabled.

whether you'll be able to tell the difference between a 9070XT, 5070ti and 5080 in a 1440p blind test is going to be interesting.

If the last few days of news if there's any card that's DOA it actually looks like the £1350 5080.

Already coming up with the "blind test" argument when we know in reality the numbers will be behind the 5070 ti.

Also FSR4 isn't faster than FSR3. It's just ML based. It's not gonna provide the card magic to perform better than the 7900 XTX.

 

[terley]

Already coming up with the "blind test" argument when we know in reality the numbers will be behind the 5070 ti.

Also FSR4 isn't faster than FSR3. It's just ML based. It's not gonna provide the card magic to perform better than the 7900 XTX.

now look who's making stuff up we've seen FSR 4.0, granted we don't know the performance benefits.. but we do have a great idea about the visual improvement over FSR 3.1

 

[muon]

now look who's making stuff up we've seen FSR 4.0, granted we don't know the performance benefits.. but we do have a great idea about the visual improvement over FSR 3.1

Erm...

 

[terley]

Erm...

The "now look who's making stuff up" is the speculation despite you saying "we know in reality the numbers will be behind the 5070ti", we don't know that.. we can't know that.. the only people who can work at AMD.

 

[muon]

The "now look who's making stuff up" is the speculation despite you saying "we know in reality the numbers will be behind the 5070ti", we don't know that.. we can't know that.. the only people who can work at AMD.

I'm replying to someone who said FSR4 will make it outperform the 7900 XTX. You have numbers confiming this given you've come to their defence?

We know it will be 5070 ti at best because AMD have alliuded to as such. Just need to believe AMD on their word. Apart from this all benchmarks we have seen is nonsense. This is a 64 CU card running at 3+ ghz. This perfromance checks out.

 

[terley]

I don't care what they said, i'm calling out your: "we know it will be behind a 5070ti"

 

[muon]

I don't care what they said, i'm calling out your: "we know it will be behind a 5070ti"

Okay.

 

[terley]

You know that chart was made for naming convention purposes only right?

I'm replying to someone who said FSR4 will make it outperform the 7900 XTX. You have numbers confiming this given you've come to their defence?

We know it will be 5070 ti at best because AMD have alliuded to as such. Just need to believe AMD on their word. APrt from this all benchmarks we have seen is nonsense. This is a 64 CU card running at 3+ ghz. This perfromance checks out.

 

[muon]

You know that chart was made for naming convention purposes only right?

Who from AMD told you that?

If it was naming convention matching to nvidia, then they wouldn't have shown where RDNA3 cards sit or 5000 series shifting up.

 

[terley]

It's literally in the title.. Also this whole editing a reply thing is kinda cringe man.. thats the stuff we did back in the early 2000s to be edgy.

 

[muon]

It's literally in the title.. Also this whole editing a reply thing is kinda cringe man.. thats the stuff we did back in the early 2000s to be edgy.

Okay, these cards will beat the 7900 XTX with FSR4 and won't be behind the 5070 Ti. The 64 CUs running at 3ghz will show such a massive IPC gain that it will actually be close to the 4090.

All the while AMD decided to call these 70 series cards literally showing where they are branded to sit in the stack against AMD and Nvidia's previous gen (and 5000 series).

This is literally history repeating itself every AMD release.

 

[GhostDog1981]

Okay, these cards will beat the 7900 XTX with FSR4 and won't be behind the 5070 Ti. The 64 CUs running at 3ghz will show such a massive IPC gain that it will actually be close to the 4090.

All the while AMD decided to call these 70 series cards literally showing where they are branded to sit in the stack against AMD and Nvidia's previous gen (and 5000 series).

This is literally history repeating itself every AMD release.

How many CUs did the 7800xt have? Didn’t show much IPC gain over the 6800xt but on par with last gen flagship 6900xt.

 

[muon]

How many CUs did the 7800xt have? Didn’t show much IPC gain over the 6800xt but on par with last gen flagship 6900xt.

Versus the 6800 XT, it is 60 vs 72 CUs. So a 20% improvement on that and then it was 5% better as well, although it was clocked 5% higher.

So, ignoring the faster memory, I'd say +20% IPC from RDNA2 to RDNA3.

 

[terley]

Okay, these cards will beat the 7900 XTX with FSR4 and won't be behind the 5070 Ti. The 64 CUs running at 3ghz will show such a massive IPC gain that it will actually be close to the 4090.

All the while AMD decided to call these 70 series cards literally showing where they are branded to sit in the stack against AMD and Nvidia's previous gen (and 5000 series).

This is literally history repeating itself every AMD release.

early leaked benchmarks have the 5070ti 7.6% faster than 4070ti, but 20% faster in Blender.

all we have thus far is a monster hunter wilds benchmark from the 9070xt

these are the 4070ti benchmarks from user submitted data across different settings