• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** The AMD RDNA 4 Rumour Mill ***

Nah, not even close.

To quote yourself in another thread

"Give it a few months, the 5070 Ti won't have the persistent supply issues of the 5090. This will be a good deal at $750 and will be the GPU to buy - enough VRAM until the new consoles push reqs further, and plenty of performance + a killer feature set. Only way I can see anything else touching it is if AMD decides to launch the 9070 XT at $600, but even that's probably not enough (and AMD won't do it anyway)"
 
To quote yourself in another thread

"Give it a few months, the 5070 Ti won't have the persistent supply issues of the 5090. This will be a good deal at $750 and will be the GPU to buy - enough VRAM until the new consoles push reqs further, and plenty of performance + a killer feature set. Only way I can see anything else touching it is if AMD decides to launch the 9070 XT at $600, but even that's probably not enough (and AMD won't do it anyway)"

Might want to give the boy a hand taking his foot out of his mouth.
 
Not bad, pretty much what I was expecting. I'm not sure the '23% performance per $' is really going to be enough to turn the tide against Nvidia assuming AMD is at least on parity with regards to software, upscaling, Ray Tracing, AI, non gaming work etc but if AMD can retail it's cards around that level they've just shown and the 5070Ti is only really available at inflated prices points they could be onto a winner for next few months once supply sorts itself out.

The RX9070 non XT is to expensive IMO being only $50 cheaper for being 10%-15% slower. Just compare it to Intel who were criticised for pricing the B570 at $220 when the B580 was priced at $250 but those cards are less then half the price of these new AMD cards so you would expect a much bigger discount then $50 for a slower model.
 
Last edited:

For example, compared to the 7900 XTX, Team Red is showing off much better quality while encoding H.264 (AVC) at 1080p using 6 Mbps bitrate. Speaking of H.264, the new media engine also improves low-latency H.264 encoding at lower bitrates.
In the case of HEVC (H.266), AMD claims an 11% encode quality improvement. AV1 is also seeing encoding efficiency improvements thanks to B Frames. Up to 8K 75 fps encoding is supported for HEVC and AV1, says AMD.

Aside from encoding improvements, decoding is also set to see some big gains. The company says the new VCN version brings low-power video playback with "more than 50% performance uplift for AV1 and VP9". This can be pretty significant since a lot of major web content is on VP9 or AV1. Not much is mentioned about H.264 and H.265 though. Perhaps the company feels there isn't much room for optimization for these codecs.

 
Last edited:
To quote yourself in another thread

"Give it a few months, the 5070 Ti won't have the persistent supply issues of the 5090. This will be a good deal at $750 and will be the GPU to buy - enough VRAM until the new consoles push reqs further, and plenty of performance + a killer feature set. Only way I can see anything else touching it is if AMD decides to launch the 9070 XT at $600, but even that's probably not enough (and AMD won't do it anyway)"

gotcha-bitch-dave-chappelle.gif
 
HUB saying AMD didn't go low enough vs nvidia. Marketshare will go nowhere if nvidia get supply going and msrp cards land.
 
Back
Top Bottom