No? Everything on WCCF should be ignored (or at least taken with 5 bags of salt).
Don't click on it, at all! (unless you want to use up your Winter grit supply)
![Big Grin :D :D](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/biggrin.gif)
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
No? Everything on WCCF should be ignored (or at least taken with 5 bags of salt).
Those are the launch dates. We don't know the release dates yet.
+1
Polaris launched June 1st last year but cards weren't available til June 29th, and AiB cards a month after that. Hopefully it won't be as long this time...
Im sure amd said 27th july FE will launch. So does that mean on that date we will find out what date the FE will release?Those are the launch dates. We don't know the release dates yet.
Im sure amd said 27th july FE will launch. So does that mean on that date we will find out what date the FE will release?
Or does it means launch is when they frist start selling them?
If the 16GB AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition (£1139) can beat the 12GB Titan Xp (£1099) noticeably then it could do well, but at £1,656 the Liquid-Cooled Frontier Edition is a bit pricy, does it perform that much better than the air cooled one? :S
My thoughts exactly but seems i am wrong?I'm sure it's when they will be on sale to the public, but I could be wrong.
Can we extrapolate price for gaming RX Vega from ratio Polaris Pro vs RX 480?
Polaris WX is 650, regular 480 was 210 (happy days). So roughly a third of the price
Workstation Vega FE is 1650, RX Vega XT projected 550?
Workstation Vega cut down FE is 1150, regular RX Vega Pro to be 380?
number may be off, but is there any ground to the ratio thing?
Im sure amd said 27th july FE will launch. So does that mean on that date we will find out what date the FE will release?
Or does it means launch is when they frist start selling them?
I'm sure it's when they will be on sale to the public, but I could be wrong.
Can we extrapolate price for gaming RX Vega from ratio Polaris Pro vs RX 480?
Polaris WX is 650, regular 480 was 210 (happy days). So roughly a third of the price
Workstation Vega FE is 1650, RX Vega XT projected 550?
Workstation Vega cut down FE is 1150, regular RX Vega Pro to be 380?
number may be off, but is there any ground to the ratio thing?
Hope it won't be much more than £400 as that's top end of my budget![]()
I so wanted to buy a Vega but AMD have just taken too long and not released enough information. I simply couldn't ignore the mining craze & are flogging my RX480 for profit and are going team green with a GTX 1080. It's a real shame from my perspective & I wouldn't be surprised if AMD are seriously regretting putting all their eggs in the HBM2 basket.
Hope it won't be much more than £400 as that's top end of my budget![]()
I so wanted to buy a Vega but AMD have just taken too long and not released enough information. I simply couldn't ignore the mining craze & are flogging my RX480 for profit and are going team green with a GTX 1080. It's a real shame from my perspective & I wouldn't be surprised if AMD are seriously regretting putting all their eggs in the HBM2 basket.
Considering how 5x has developed and the fact that Hawaii & Grenada's 512bit memory had more than enough bandwidth anyway I've gotta agree.
Please don't let Fury release fiasko repeatThat's not gonna happen.
On release Fury Pro's were £430 for the base model or £440 for the overclocked model,
The Fury X was from £500 to £640 depending on the brand you went for.
That tells us the Vega cards will at least sit at those prices.
I think it's more than likely that we can add £100 or more to each of those.
I'm guessing the full RX Vega card will be at around the £600 mark in the best case scenario.
Whether that's a good deal or not will depend on the performance but I think it's going to be pricey for how it performs.
Please don't let Fury release fiasko repeat
HBM not clocked as well as expected. Bad availability. Performance to_be_fixed_in_drivers. The friggin noisy pump. But most of all priced to compete with 980Ti but underwhelming at first.
And as a result the fury x was nowhere as impressive then. If it weren't for the 980ti, people would have been screaming about how good the fury x was for bang per buck just as people are with their "cheap" 1080ti's now because they are getting "titan" performance for considerably less.