On the flip side, if 75% of people pay the new prices and 25% don't, then prices stay high and the 25% gain nothing (they just never buy because prices never fall).
I'm not caving in, but because of this I don't expect nV to lower prices, instead I expect to leave PC gaming behind.
TBH,dude I have not caved in once in the last decade,and yet always paid what I roughly budgeted for and still run new games on my desktop and the same goes with all my mates.
In the end nobody is forcing you to run a game right now -if my system can't run a game now to a reasonable level,I am quite happy to wait and run other games,and upgrade it at an appropriate time.
The same goes with all my enthusiast friends and a few work in the computing industry themselves in R and D,etc.
There are 1000s and 1000s of games out there - we are massively spoilt for choice. Its like all those people who "need" the latest smartphone or car. How much of that "need" is "want"?
How many PC gamers joke in other threads on how they have 100s of games in their libraries,most of which they hardly play??
The issue with computer forums they seem to over-estimate how much hardware you need for 99% of games. Its why I find YT a treasure trove of information when it comes to seeing how games run.
Is it a surprise?? Nope,since this is not a gaming forum,but one based around acquiring new shiny computer hardware as a hobby in itself!!
Don't get me wrong talking about new hardware and new tech is very interesting as is the speculation about things,but in the end you don't need to leave PC gaming behind especially since you have an RX480 4GB(IIRC) and you will be fine with plenty of games.
If the odd game comes along you can't run,put it into the "will play in the future" list and enjoy all the other great titles out there.