But his pass completion made most Liverpool fans celebrate to completion as well
.
Lol



But his pass completion made most Liverpool fans celebrate to completion as well
.
Apart from the fact we have a better win % when he isnt playing you mean?
Yes the result wasn't the greatest, but it flattered West Brom. We will get tonked a few times this year as we get used to the BR style of play but I think we will also dish out a few hammerings aswell.
We really do need a striker though, a guy that can stick it in the net. Suarez isn't a number 9. Either play Carroll in the middle or get Jordan Rhodes in.
[/QUOTE]
It will soon be the only football worth watching. All the picture now needs is a "debt clasico". :p:D
How is that an "apart from the fact", in what way is Gerrard playing badly for the team when he's on the bench? When he's ON the pitch and playing badly the team are terrible, because when he's on the pitch everyone seems to be sucked into the Gerrard show, everyone passes to Gerrard, everyone expects Gerrard to create something, everyone waits for Gerrard to step up, everyone lets him take the freekicks and do what he wants and plays around Gerrard.
If Aguero has a bad game, someone else steps up, if Silva has a bad game someone else steps up, when Gerrard is on the pitch no one does anything and if Gerrard doesn't do anything Liverpool suck. When he's not on the pitch Liverpool look like a team of players again(still a not great team though), hence they need to move on from Gerrard, he's not a patch on the player he was a few years ago to the point where he seems to hurt the team more often than win games for them now.
It will soon be the only football worth watching. All the picture now needs is a "debt clasico".![]()
Show me a team that performed when their captain, their talismanic player didn't? Arsenal certainly didn't when Van Persie wasn't firing. Man United arguably don't when Rooney isn't playing well. Man City struggle when Yaya doesn't play well.
As usual, you start spouting off your Anti Liverpool agenda and as usual your talking out your behind.
Oh and it could be argued that we only fell away from the Champions League spots once Lucas got injured, our bad form coinciding when he wasn't in the team. Nothing to do with how well Gerrard was playing up until then.
Oh and it could be argued that we only fell away from the Champions League spots once Lucas got injured, our bad form coinciding when he wasn't in the team. Nothing to do with how well Gerrard was playing up until then.
..
As for my anti liverpool agenda, how is saying Liverpool need to replace Gerrard anti Liverpool? A player can't get worse, ever, and if suggested its anti Liverpool.
.
Dawson to QPR, am I the only one completely confused as to why Spurs would sell Dawson?
Possibly AVB views him as too slow and doesn't want a repeat of JT not being able to play the high line? Maybe he's perceived as too injury prone? Or it could be that as an English player Dawson is worth an inflated fee that AVB sees as being better value spent elsewhere?Dawson to QPR, am I the only one completely confused as to why Spurs would sell Dawson?