The Banter Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well firstly that isn't supposed to be true afaik, secondly, still doesn't mean anything.

If someone asks if he's in the squad and he says no, whats the natural second question, do you think he'll be picked in the future.

Well lets see, he won't improve on where he is now, and he's injury prone and now older... how many players improve and become less injury prone when they hit Rio's age.

Again, this is a conversation he could have with anyone else, the only issue here is that someone has to run to the press and shout his mouth off. People don't need to do that full stop, they are about half the problem with the press, the other half is overblown reporting, misquoting, intentionally misrepresenting and creating an issue.

Two situations off the top of my head, the Cesc spitting incident. One pratt runs to the press with a story, the press make it look worse than it was to start with, and nothing is done when its proven false. Cesc was shown on video on the pitch at the time this happened, what also happened was most of the media posted this picture that tried to make it look like Cesc was pulling an angry face at Fagan, stupid people pointed this out that Cesc was trying to start a fight, yet when you look at the picture Cesc is in the foreground, Fagan the background and they aren't anywhere near each other but stupid people see it as Cesc facing off with him. It added "Cesc was angry" intent to the story, then it became about why Cesc was on the pitch, and in a tracksuit.... when almost every game other players/staff, media, cameramen, trainers, ballboys, etc, come on the pitch.

Another one was the Hamilton/hot bird from that band story, theres a picture where she's clearly NOT kissing the wife beater, but the story went worldwide, a fuzzy picture inside a club to fool stupid people into thinking they were kissing.

Press = god awful, people who run to the press with nothing stories = almost as bad.
 
:o

For starters since he got the gig with Sky it's the first time he's ever actually done commentary on one of our games secondly he showed no bias towards us whatsoever the same of which can not be said for the likes of Niall Quinn when he does City games

Agree with Tom, obviously he shows his support for manu whether it be gritting his teeth with they lost the CL or just commenting on how great the players are to play with he is probably one of the pundits/commentators I would first pick due to the fact he isn't retarded like most of them and is actually interesting.
 
iI04qBVyEBQp2.gif
 
Think you're missing the point Baz, he didn't say Ferdinand wasn't in the squad, that wasn't the problem. This is what he said apparently;



Which is just unacceptable for the England manager to be casually portraying this to random people on the Tube.

Key word there is apparently. He's denied saying that and claims he only told them that he wouldn't be in the squad.
 
:o

For starters since he got the gig with Sky it's the first time he's ever actually done commentary on one of our games secondly he showed no bias towards us whatsoever the same of which can not be said for the likes of Niall Quinn when he does City games

He showed far too much bias. IIRC the Cleverly goal was the first shot you had made all second half. Then Gary says "well that's deserved", don't think I laughed so much! It was blatantly a cross too...

We had pegged you back so much in the second half. We should have had a pen for the shirt pull on Cisse, which was never seen as well. So I have no idea why Gary thought you deserved the 3rd goal??
 
He showed far too much bias. IIRC the Cleverly goal was the first shot you had made all second half. Then Gary says "well that's deserved", don't think I laughed so much! It was blatantly a cross too...

We had pegged you back so much in the second half. We should have had a pen for the shirt pull on Cisse, which was never seen as well. So I have no idea why Gary thought you deserved the 3rd goal??

Deserved because of the way we played for the first 25 minutes? Deserved for the way we defended? Who knows and although I cant remember exactly when they happened I remember Rooney having a shot in the second half which Harper saved, RVP also scored but was flagged offside either way one comment is hardly showing far too much bias
 
Never been a massive fan (Man U fan, nor is my Chelsea house mate) of his especially when he became a pundit but the more we watched the more comical moments happened. His celebration for Torres's CL semi final goal still has me in stitches. He 'usually' talks sense, not seen much of his take on United though.
 
I don't think he offers any bias towards United - he has 'knowledge' about them, so he may talk about how the player acts in the dressing room or about how the club works or something like that but then that's just standard 'I've played with x,y,z player' sort of knowledge, not any bias.
 
I am waiting for the day United win the title at Anfield or just against Liverpool and for Neville to go absolute ape ****, funny thinking about it now, probably put my foot through the TV if it happened :p
 
I am waiting for the day United win the title at Anfield or just against Liverpool and for Neville to go absolute ape ****, funny thinking about it now, probably put my foot through the TV if it happened :p

You'll become a YouTube legend if you record that. Why not just do it next time Liverpool lose. :p
 
I agree, he might not be the best pundit or commentator in the world, but consider what he's up against and he's easily one of the better ones.
 
Neville being better than other Sky pundits doesn't say much. It's like saying he's your favourite terminal disease. I actually don't have too much of an issue with Neville as a pundit, he's still a rat faced **** though.

And that youtube clip is surprisingly funny.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom