The Battlefield 4 Thread ~ Server details in opening post ~
- Thread starter ~Mike~
- Start date
- Status
Whilst it is possible for a broken game to still be fun, it mostly ruins the game for the players who supported the franchise.
The vanilla game game never been "playable" and the CTE showed the world how good it could have been. Me and SC played the CTE loads this summer and neither of us played the vanilla game since 2nd assault.
This September patch has the potential for great things. It also has the potential to be the normal dice experience and break more things than it fixes.
Pretty much, HDD loading times are a joke. Would definitely recommend a 120GB ssd for Windows and a few games.
What on earth are you on about?
The game loads fairly slowly on SSD, but theres a lot of client server sync stuff going on. If you are joining a server at the start and find people have already made it to the middle base on conquest then you are an SSD peasant.
Last edited:
I've been thinking about upgrading allot and I just don't see the point: Game hits 135 without AA at 2560x1440 > 80% and GSYNC takes care of the rest. I'm not convinced that i would notice any difference upgrading to the 9 series.
I guess I will wait for full fat or a new game which forces my hand.
@Hazzard: That's one hell of an upgrade
I guess I will wait for full fat or a new game which forces my hand.
@Hazzard: That's one hell of an upgrade
@Hazzard: That's one hell of an upgrade
But will it allow me to get a hit marker on Nexus that's the question?
What do you mean 2560x1440 > 80%?
Does that mean you are running at 80% resolution scale?
lol im in watching counter from 5 on my mx 512mb, on my old m4 it was slightly slower. on mech samsung drive upto a minute its worlds of difference.
Yep! It's that good I would factor this into the decision to invest. I.e., you don't necessarily have to always be hitting 100% of your refresh rate for the game to feel really nice and smooth.
Last edited:
On a single 780 @ Ultra (except AA)??? I don't even get close to that...
Us pros play with everything on low/off except mesh
+1!
In "real world usage", **** all difference between these SSD's, just go for a decent brand that is reliable and has good customer service and/or a good value one.
No difference between my crucial m4 and samsung 840 evo even with this performance problem:
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18615995
Shows in benchmarks but in real world usage, not noticed an issue at all.
But will it allow me to get a hit marker on Nexus that's the question?
Nope! You need anti-nexus bot cheat V25 for that
Asus PG278Q ROG Swift 27" G-Sync 144Hz Gaming Widescreen LED Slim Bezel Monitor - Black/Red 1 £558.29
MSI GeForce GTX 970 Gaming Edition 4096MB GDDR5 PCI-Express Graphics Card 2 £469.98
Order placed
Nice!
Few benchmarks ive ran recently. All max settings at 1920x1200.
Single 780.
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
31543, 343608, 52, 183, 91.799
Sli 780's.
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
87290, 600000, 91, 201, 145.483
On a laggy server the fps can still tank into the 50's with sli. But i gotta say the scaling with sli in bf4 is very impressive. Those benchmarks were ran on 64 player cq large paracel storm. This along with seige of shanghai are pretty demanding. Im now at the point were im resolution bottlenecked.
Have you measured frametimes between single and dual setter? People say single is always better but tbh in SLI you get more frames and more frames usually gives lower frametimes so it may balance out.
Pretty sure microstutter is a thing of the past on most multi GPU setups now, the only thing that bothers me is games that don't work in SLI or don't scale much.
Pretty sure microstutter is a thing of the past on most multi GPU setups now, the only thing that bothers me is games that don't work in SLI or don't scale much.
I havent no, problem with bf4 is the lag on a lot of servers. Quite often it will cause massive fps drops. The CTE is worlds apart so hopefully the changes in the next patch will help.
- Status