The BBC has no leftist bias at all.

[The Running Man]

You think only white people read the guardian?

Didn't answer my question either.

No, but as you can see the articles ALL target White British as you can see from the imagery.

Do you think the best way to reach out to someone who isn't White British is to show pictures of white British?

Watch a TV advert, notice for female products, typically they use females. Most adverts also include a high level of diversity to attract a diverse consumer range.

Thats marketing 101.

If white British already have a birth rate of sub 2, why target them with articles telling them.to reduce it even more?

 

[chroniclard]

Daily Mail have similar stories, one with a black father/child, are they targeting only black people or just reporting news/studies.

There also appear to be Guardian articles on the subject with BAME people in them.

 

[The Running Man]

Daily Mail have similar stories, one with a black father/child, are they targeting only black people or just reporting news/studies.

There also appear to be Guardian articles on the subject with BAME people in them.

Looking at the numbers some groups, I.e bame have higher than 2.0 children and may have cultural issues around single parenthood.

The point in this thread is that certain highly left wing media will focus on huge positives of immigration for example to grow the population, while targeting certain groups with stories designed to guilt them into having fewer children when they already have comparatively low fertility rates.

 

[chroniclard]

Looking at the numbers some groups, I.e bame have higher than 2.0 children and may have cultural issues around single parenthood.

The point in this thread is that certain highly left wing media will focus on huge positives of immigration for example to grow the population, while targeting certain groups with stories designed to guilt them into having fewer children when they already have comparatively low fertility rates.

They are only targeting certain groups in your head.

 

[VincentHanna]

Or maybe you are just selecting the articles that (you think) support your wonderful argument that there is a plot by the left wing media to convince white people to have no children, whilst encouraging migrants to have lots of children?

As I keep asking - how many kids do you have?

Often the people most concerned about the birth-rate don't seem to be doing anything about it themselves.

 

[Roar87]

No, but as you can see the articles ALL target White British as you can see from the imagery.

Do you think the best way to reach out to someone who isn't White British is to show pictures of white British?

Watch a TV advert, notice for female products, typically they use females. Most adverts also include a high level of diversity to attract a diverse consumer range.

Thats marketing 101.

If white British already have a birth rate of sub 2, why target them with articles telling them.to reduce it even more?

I think if they used pictures of non-White British people it could be viewed as racist

 

[The Running Man]

They are only targeting certain groups in your head.

They are doing it in the article.

https://online.maryville.edu/online...iversity-and-inclusion-in-modern-advertising/

Just Google diversity and marketing , you'll be able to get up to speed in about 5 seconds.

 

[inogen]

You seem to be under the misapprehension that targeting majority demographics works in the same way as targeting ethnic minorities.

Nobody is being ethnically targeted here, the imagery does not exclude by ethnicity. Whaddya want? The Village People?

TBH, you sound like one of those white supremacists who are convinced that the human race is some kind of ethnic struggle for population dominance. Yaknow... like Hitler.

 

[potatolord]

This is far more it than the lazy thinking, black and brown people should have less babies and so get themselves out of poverty nonsense. Women stop having babies or have fewer babies because they have other options. These opportunities open up because their is better schools and collages, more well paying jobs in their area, their area gets investment. If you are unfortunate to live in a very deprived area not having kids isn't going to fix those problems, it might help get a few out but it still leaves the vast majority exactly where they were.

I agree, better opportunities lead to more choice and different decisions.

I'd guess (and pick me up on it if I'm talking nonsense) that the greatest determinant of "success" in life is probably household income.

I know you can point at, for example, poor Chinese immigrants and how well their children do, but the second generation born in the UK will be the real test of that rule.

Jeez, some of the comments here are... disappointing. That's not aimed at you, by the way.

 

[The Running Man]

You seem to be under the misapprehension that targeting majority demographics works in the same way as targeting ethnic minorities.

Nobody is being ethnically targeted here, the imagery does not exclude by ethnicity. Whaddya want? The Village People?

TBH, you sound like one of those white supremacists who are convinced that the human race is some kind of ethnic struggle for population dominance. Yaknow... like Hitler.

If you say so without any evidence to back it up.

Strong ww2 based argument. Would read again!

 

[inogen]

Strong ww2 based argument. Would read again!

That retort would only really work if I didn't have a point.

 

[Colonel_Klinck]

I agree, better opportunities lead to more choice and different decisions.

I'd guess (and pick me up on it if I'm talking nonsense) that the greatest determinant of "success" in life is probably household income.

I know you can point at, for example, poor Chinese immigrants and how well their children do, but the second generation born in the UK will be the real test of that rule.

Jeez, some of the comments here are... disappointing. That's not aimed at you, by the way.

Dude this forum sadly has a small but very vocal group of bigots. You'll learn to spot them, they mainly hang out in GD as many are banned from SC.

 

[Chris Wilson]

Dude this forum sadly has a small but very vocal group of bigots. You'll learn to spot them, they mainly hang out in GD as many are banned from SC.

Once you realise how many bigots, racists, xenophobes and misogynists there are in the UK and globally, going about their lawful business with no criminal activity, harming nothing but people's fragile sensitivities, you will understand how risible banning a small but vocal group that cause apoplexy to the cloistered world of the Speaker's Corner actually is

It's stuffy in there, when the frustration of constantly agreeing with each other boils over they find a subject in here to try and force their liberal, globalists views upon.

If you live to be 750 there'll still be bigots, racists, xenophobes and misogynists around, it's called, unpalatable as it may seem, human nature.

 

[Eurofighter]

Yup. The BBC is very London centric and has been invaded by Lesbians or something. I'm not sure. I do prefer the news to other channels by having an equal argument on both sides but it is the topics that they constantly push down our throats is mega woke.

You would think that the fact that BJ got in shows that most people in Britain don't want this.

Anyway i dont pay my tv licence.

 

[Colonel_Klinck]

Once you realise how many bigots, racists, xenophobes and misogynists there are in the UK and globally, going about their lawful business with no criminal activity, harming nothing but people's fragile sensitivities, you will understand how risible banning a small but vocal group that cause apoplexy to the cloistered world of the Speaker's Corner actually is

It's stuffy in there, when the frustration of constantly agreeing with each other boils over they find a subject in here to try and force their liberal, globalists views upon.

If you live to be 750 there'll still be bigots, racists, xenophobes and misogynists around, it's called, unpalatable as it may seem, human nature.

They weren't banned for their political views. They were banned for the language they used, I know, I've had 2 time outs and both were for language, not opinion. There are still plenty of opinions from the right in SC, some with very questionable political views but they are careful in their use of language, as are we all that want to keep our access.

 

[Colonel_Klinck]

Yup. The BBC is very London centric and has been invaded by Lesbians or something. I'm not sure. I do prefer the news to other channels by having an equal argument on both sides but it is the topics that they constantly push down our throats is mega woke.

You would think that the fact that BJ got in shows that most people in Britain don't want this.

Anyway i dont pay my tv licence.

BJ got in in part because Labour had the worst leader in perhaps my 50 years. Also off the back of Brexit and because he's a populist liar who will tell people exactly what they want to hear. He's made a career of lying. Now what does that say about the UK electorate that they'll happily elect a proven liar? Nothing good that is for sure.

 

[Eurofighter]

BJ got in in part because Labour had the worst leader in perhaps my 50 years. Also off the back of Brexit and because he's a populist liar who will tell people exactly what they want to hear. He's made a career of lying. Now what does that say about the UK electorate that they'll happily elect a proven liar? Nothing good that is for sure.

What do the people want from the BBC then because it isn't what it is at the moment.

 

[thenewoc]

Not sure why my post was deleted between what is now #29 & #30. There doesn't seem to be anyway to view the deleted post as the poster.

 

[Kenai]

Not sure why my post was deleted between what is now #29 & #30. There doesn't seem to be anyway to view the deleted post as the poster.

When it contained the words "It's an inherent problem within their race", it doesn't take much thinking to figure out why it probably got deleted.

 

[chroniclard]

No matter how many times people try to paint the BBC being especially biased it all turns out to be drivel.