The Big WWE Wrestling Thread

roid · 31 Jan 2009 at 15:57

shaffaaf27 said:
i still think the heat vikie gets > edge and orton.

Her voice hurts my ears, and the sight of her hurts my eyes

shaffaaf27 · 31 Jan 2009 at 16:02

edge>hhh IMO, i dunno but for me, I have seen everything hh can do, so im just bored off him know. edge though is fanstastic, i <3 him

jericho too, he needs a propper title reign

Haydz · 1 Feb 2009 at 00:52

I actually lost interest in the WWE tottaly about half way through last year.. so im majorly behind.. I think last i remember was Batista's dominant era where he was virtually unstoppable, how much has changed since?

shaffaaf27 · 1 Feb 2009 at 01:15

a lot

tista is injured, so we have people that can wrestle as champs

i did think that this years RR was one of my fav, maybe not the winner but the hole thing

roid · 1 Feb 2009 at 09:26

shaffaaf27 said:
a lot

tista is injured, so we have people that can wrestle as champs

i did think that this years RR was one of my fav, maybe not the winner but the hole thing

What was wrong with Orton winning? It fit perfectly in with Legacy and was/is the most deserving superstar currently.

Tute · 1 Feb 2009 at 11:39

roid said:
What was wrong with Orton winning? It fit perfectly in with Legacy and was/is the most deserving superstar currently.

Because it was just so damn predictable?

I think Orton was the most deserving but it detracted from the whole thing, knowing who would win before the first two entered the ring.

utajoker · 1 Feb 2009 at 14:15

to be honest you knew who won before the show even started, in the titles when it was coming on they had a load of royal rumble highlights of winners, then merged the music with "i hear voices" and orton apearing.

roid · 1 Feb 2009 at 16:25

You guys seem really unhappy with the fact that Orton won the Royal Rumble. Yes it was clearly obvious from the start; but who else would you give it too? I'm really interested to know as it just makes perfect sense to have Orton win the rumble regardless of how easy it was to tell he was the winner.

shaffaaf27 · 1 Feb 2009 at 18:11

i knew he would win it, he deserved it, but it was predictable. i just wish they had kane win it lol

Haydz · 1 Feb 2009 at 18:14

roid said:
You guys seem really unhappy with the fact that Orton won the Royal Rumble. Yes it was clearly obvious from the start; but who else would you give it too? I'm really interested to know as it just makes perfect sense to have Orton win the rumble regardless of how easy it was to tell he was the winner.

Why was it predictable (I've been out of the scene for awhile)... was there some sort of feud going on

?

shaffaaf27 · 1 Feb 2009 at 18:45

hes been in the spot light, in a major way, but with no title.

its not that he doesnt deserve it, and that he isnt a great heel, i just find his mathes boring.

Haydz · 1 Feb 2009 at 18:46

I must start watching again and keep up with it. I heard flair has retired?

shaffaaf27 · 1 Feb 2009 at 20:34

last year WM

roid · 1 Feb 2009 at 20:36

shaffaaf27 said:
hes been in the spot light, in a major way, but with no title.

its not that he doesnt deserve it, and that he isnt a great heel, i just find his mathes boring.

He is a brilliant heel, that is 100% for sure.

shaffaaf27 · 1 Feb 2009 at 20:43

not denyign that one bit

(though IMO, jericho and vikie are better)

crunchman · 1 Feb 2009 at 21:10

roid said:
You guys seem really unhappy with the fact that Orton won the Royal Rumble. Yes it was clearly obvious from the start; but who else would you give it too? I'm really interested to know as it just makes perfect sense to have Orton win the rumble regardless of how easy it was to tell he was the winner.

CM Punk or MVP, so has to happen !

roid · 1 Feb 2009 at 22:23

crunchman said:
CM Punk or MVP, so has to happen !

CM Punk had just been given the IC title it would have made 0 sense to give him a main event at WM.

MVP would have been a possibility as he had just come out of his losing streak; also the writers are still keeping him down to mid-card for the most part still because of the peeing incident; but alas i don't think he is ready for the main event at WM, give him 2-3 years and i think he will be on the way. Keep trying guys

crunchman · 2 Feb 2009 at 00:26

roid said:
CM Punk had just been given the IC title it would have made 0 sense to give him a main event at WM.

MVP would have been a possibility as he had just come out of his losing streak; also the writers are still keeping him down to mid-card for the most part still because of the peeing incident; but alas i don't think he is ready for the main event at WM, give him 2-3 years and i think he will be on the way. Keep trying guys

It wasn't much of a try from me, haven't watched WWE since last wrestlemania

, so I didn't know he'd got a belt. I'm sr=till a bit ****** off I missed his world title run :/

Just a big fan of CM Punk from his ROH days, and what I'd seen of MVP was impressive, good wrestler and charismatic as hell

roid · 2 Feb 2009 at 09:28

crunchman said:
It wasn't much of a try from me, haven't watched WWE since last wrestlemania , so I didn't know he'd got a belt. I'm sr=till a bit ****** off I missed his world title run :/

Just a big fan of CM Punk from his ROH days, and what I'd seen of MVP was impressive, good wrestler and charismatic as hell

They are in the process of turning MVP around which is good to see. He's going to be a huge babyface if everything turns out for him. CM Punk was good in his ROH days no doubt, but Vince always is abit of a tard when it comes to talent he didn't make. He never lets them get to the top and if he does, he usually pushes them off quite quickly and hastily; ala CM punk from WHC.

Tom84 · 2 Feb 2009 at 18:30

It's amazing how so many people knew Orton would win the rumble yet no one actually mentioned it before the event :rolleyes:

Moving along though what the hell is Mike Knox doing in the Raw Elimination Chamber match at NWO? As if having Kingston in it wasn't bad enough!