Associate
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
got a piccy of my go this time fresh reinstall so no monitoring software was with 2600k @4.8
16gb of corsair vengance @1600
and a corsair force gt 120gb hdd
The CustomPC Media Benchmarking Suite
- Thread starter BioVirus87
- Start date
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
got a piccy of my go this time fresh reinstall so no monitoring software was with 2600k @4.8
16gb of corsair vengance @1600
and a corsair force gt 120gb hdd
Soldato
Just re-ran the FX @ 4.8 but did it at 240x20 rather than 200x24 (ie, clocked it properly and not just with the multiplier).
It would seem that BD scales much better if clocked this way, the overall score is only slightly lower than @ 5GHz via raised multiplier only and it's actually higher for video and multi-tasking than 5GHz with just the multi -
I'll see what happens if I can get it stable @ 5GHz with a higher bus speed
It would seem that BD scales much better if clocked this way, the overall score is only slightly lower than @ 5GHz via raised multiplier only and it's actually higher for video and multi-tasking than 5GHz with just the multi -
I'll see what happens if I can get it stable @ 5GHz with a higher bus speed
Associate
First try with 5.1Ghz will try for more
Soldato
FX6100 @ 4.6 (265 x 17.5). Image editing has dropped but I'm seeing higher gains on the multithreaded sections and an overall score nearly 100 points more than a run at 5GHz with a higher multiplier.
Soldato
Let's all point at my CPU and laugh:
My i5 2500k can't come soon enough.
My i5 2500k can't come soon enough.
Associate
Thats funny /points/ hahahahaha
Soldato
It took at least an hour and three quarters
Associate
- Joined
- 19 Dec 2010
- Posts
- 500
Let's all point at my CPU and laugh:
My i5 2500k can't come soon enough.
That is awesome!
I benched my work PC on Fri, took an hour and gave me a score of 477 which I was mortified at until I saw yours.
I will bench my Home PC today as a comparison and once I have my x79 build stable, I will bench that as well...
That i5 will make you feel like you are flying
edit
As promised, I feel only sympathy for you as mine is twice as fast as yours and it is still killing me...
not quite 200 odd, but it is still bad enough..
Last edited:
32 gigs makes little difference
Did you manage to get that score with 32Gb installed and did you slow it down?
Soldato
Associate
I must try this tonight, never seen it before!
Last edited:
Necro bump!!
Summers coming!! lets get some battles going!!
on a side note, My Z77 SB i5 turned up today along with 16Gb DDR3 and a tasty new SSD, so on the look out for victims to stomp!
Just downloading the bench again (coulda sworn i saved the damn thing on an external !?!)
Who's game!
Side note, has anyone tried running this on a ramdisk? be interesting to see the results
First result
Summers coming!! lets get some battles going!!
on a side note, My Z77 SB i5 turned up today along with 16Gb DDR3 and a tasty new SSD, so on the look out for victims to stomp!
Just downloading the bench again (coulda sworn i saved the damn thing on an external !?!)
Who's game!
Side note, has anyone tried running this on a ramdisk? be interesting to see the results
First result
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 19 Dec 2010
- Posts
- 500
Nobody with an IB chip fancy a crack?
Soldato
that could be interesting. wouldn't mind seeing how they compare against SB
Well tried running it on 3770k and its only using up 40% of the processor at max am I missing some optimization as get no where close ,at the sec on a modest 4.3 overclock at stock volts. 8 GB Ram, and SSD set up as a cache for a mech drive at the sec while I mess.
Results:
Image editing: 202 seconds with 14% average CPU usage.
Image editing: 1856 points.
Video encoding: 220 seconds with 35% average CPU usage.
Video encoding: 3735 points.
Multitasking testing: 109 seconds with 21% average CPU usage.
Multitasking testing: 1722 points.
Overall score: 2438 points.
Benchmarks finished.
Results:
Image editing: 202 seconds with 14% average CPU usage.
Image editing: 1856 points.
Video encoding: 220 seconds with 35% average CPU usage.
Video encoding: 3735 points.
Multitasking testing: 109 seconds with 21% average CPU usage.
Multitasking testing: 1722 points.
Overall score: 2438 points.
Benchmarks finished.
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 19 Dec 2010
- Posts
- 500
Not a bad score to be fair, few more points to be had there I think.
Associate
Just gave the benchmark a try -
i7 2700k @ 4.5ghz
16gb corsair vangeance 1600
intel 520 ssd 128gb
GTX 580
Results:
Image editing: 212 seconds with 20% average CPU usage.
Image editing: 1773 points.
Video encoding: 220 seconds with 46% average CPU usage.
Video encoding: 3730 points.
Multitasking testing: 107 seconds with 27% average CPU usage.
Multitasking testing: 1744 points.
Overall score: 2416 points.
Benchmarks finished.
was quite chuffed :¬)
i7 2700k @ 4.5ghz
16gb corsair vangeance 1600
intel 520 ssd 128gb
GTX 580
Results:
Image editing: 212 seconds with 20% average CPU usage.
Image editing: 1773 points.
Video encoding: 220 seconds with 46% average CPU usage.
Video encoding: 3730 points.
Multitasking testing: 107 seconds with 27% average CPU usage.
Multitasking testing: 1744 points.
Overall score: 2416 points.
Benchmarks finished.
was quite chuffed :¬)
Associate
Just gave the benchmark a try on mine after replacing my motherboard
i7 2600k @ 5.0ghz not a bad score for an aging set up
Image editing: 2201 points.
Video encoding: 4248 points.
Multitasking testing: 2060 points.
Overall score: 2836 points.
not a bad score for an aging set up
i7 2600k @ 5.0ghz not a bad score for an aging set up
Image editing: 2201 points.
Video encoding: 4248 points.
Multitasking testing: 2060 points.
Overall score: 2836 points.
not a bad score for an aging set up