I hope they do for the kids sake.It's likely she's far downstream, she may never be found. Sad for everyone involved.
We only believe folk with big arms and Nursing doctorates tbh.Yes. From my engineering degree in which I studied fluid dynamics and from my 5 years experience as chief engineer for a port operator.
The fact that I have boatmen work for me who have spent 40 years on the river. Literally a minimum of 8 hours a day, 5 days a week for 40 years. Pilots who have 25 years experience on the river and deep sea experience prior to that.
The fact that we operate 5 work and tug boats amongst our fleet which are on the river every day.
That I operate daily and quarterly dredging campaigns with regular sonar surveys to monitor silting patterns and debris deposits.
He said 100% sure she isn't the section he examined, no?Exactly, it's puzzling why he would say he's 100% sure, that's more biased than the police saying she's likely in the water.
Ok fair enough I stand moderately corrected, but how much experience do you have with search and rescue when it comes to finding bodies with dangly bits (arms and legs!) in the river vs the experts in this case?
I hope they do for the kids sake.
Better than never knowing imo.A corpse will make them feel better?
He also seems to be all over the media spreading his theories, his one hour timeline etc. Wonder if he has an alibi...
Nope...but conveniently he has just released a book, this is the best publicity he could ask for. I didn't see him offering to look for Peter Baglin who's property was found by a canal.
I see a 16yo lad vanished in the exact same area in 1978...
..
(the nuts are going to love the fact it was the same day 45 years ago)
Well theres a Brexit reference, we've already had a Nazi reference, have we had a Donald Trump or Boris Johnson reference yet for the hattrick?
From the latest BBC articleDetectives have also analysed data from her Fitbit smart watch, they said
if she was wearing it, and within range I'm guessing the accelorometers might have shown something? I know some smart watches etc have automatic fall detection and can offer to call the emergency services, but I don't know if a fitbit would, or if it would update the phone app or whatever in real time/fast enough if she went into the water.From the latest BBC article
Would it have given them any extra info in order for them to be sure she fell in the river ? If abducted it would have tracked her no ?
if she was wearing it, and within range I'm guessing the accelorometers might have shown something? I know some smart watches etc have automatic fall detection and can offer to call the emergency services, but I don't know if a fitbit would, or if it would update the phone app or whatever in real time/fast enough if she went into the water.
Imagine if, after all this, she got caught short and is just having a really tricky poo in the bull rushes adjacent the river bank.
As I've said, we have pulled a fair few bodies out even in the time i've been there, we often find out where they went in (particularly with having bridges upstream). And also as I said it is incredibly difficult to model how something will behave in the river as there are a lot of variables. My point throughout was that this guy cannot say anything with certainty as certainty simply doesn't exist.
I'll give another example. Last year we had one of the largest shipping operators in the world berth one of their flagship vessels in the port. They have a team of very highly qualified engineers and sailors who dictate how the vessel is to be moored. What fendering will be required. What ropes.
Said vessel crushed its fenders and destroyed 2 of them. It then contacted the stationary fendering of our quayside absolutely ripping it to pieces. The vessel was barely scratched.
The reason, they didn't factor in how a current within the river would interact with wind loading and how the river channel magnifies wind speeds.