He can't believe she topped herself maybe? If she did. Still think she just fell in, but we'll probably never know.All this still doesn't really add up, partner saying she had problems with suicide alluded to, but he's adamanent she didn't end up in the river, so what is he suggesting?
If sudoku u wouldn't take the dog.
The partner is emotionally involved, you can't really take what they say at face value.All this still doesn't really add up, partner saying she had problems with suicide alluded to, but he's adamanent she didn't end up in the river, so what is he suggesting?
New police statement - she was an alcoholic and going through menpause also police called to the home in January - just reported on LBC
What are you trying to get out of the way you are criticising this case? It doesn't really matter what the police do as you'll just whinge and moan anyway.They said the first line, and are still keeping to that line, because they said she or anyone else hadnt been seen on cctv. When they made that statement we know they hadnt checked the cameras.
There is nothing to suggest shes fallen in the river either. Because of the extensive investigating they have done on the river that hasn't turned up anything, I'd say its now more likely that either she, or she and someone else, have walked out of the area and not been picked up on a camera.
Why can't the police stick to what they say? At the press conference earlier they said they weren't going to go in to specifics. But said she was considered a vulnerable person. Now they have gone in to specifics.
They said the first line, and are still keeping to that line, because they said she or anyone else hadnt been seen on cctv.
Why can't the police stick to what they say? At the press conference earlier they said they weren't going to go in to specifics. But said she was considered a vulnerable person. Now they have gone in to specifics.
Because they have financial problems and he is hoping she would come back - If he had said she was an alcoholic at the outset in all likelihood she would have lost her job or put on extended leave, especially given the fact she dealt with large amounts of money. Also the shame/pride factor.Bit weird how all this played out. When the husband was on tv giving interviews didn’t he think to mention she had problems with alcohol and the police have been round the house?
To what end? to embarrass a loved one for no reason?Bit weird how all this played out. When the husband was on tv giving interviews didn’t he think to mention she had problems with alcohol and the police have been round the house?
Could it also be that if she’s declared death by suicide (is that even a thing?) there’ll be no insurance payout! Dun dun dun!!!!!Because they have financial problems and he is hoping she would come back - If he had said she was an alcoholic at the outset in all likelihood she would have lost her job or put on extended leave, especially given the fact she dealt with large amounts of money. Also the shame/pride factor.
If a person goes missing they can't be declared dead until after a period of 7 years has elapsed. If you want to take this route - the go fund me request of £100k set up by Emma is more likelyCould it also be that if she’s declared death by suicide (is that even a thing?) there’ll be no insurance payout! Dun dun dun!!!!!
Aye ok, spoil my addition to the mysteryIf a person goes missing they can't be declared dead until after a period of 7 years has elapsed
I doubt anyone would have said that on TV. The police knew, and they were the ones that mattered.When the husband was on tv giving interviews didn’t he think to mention she had problems with alcohol and the police have been round the house?